Endless Wars, Democracy and a Masonic Oligarchy

I watched the news in disbelief earlier today.

Right: Harry Patch pictured in 2007

The passing away of the last WW1 veteran, Harry Patch, was the main headline. The endless rows of white headstones was shown as a testament to the futility of war.

A speech by the gent was played in which he urged everyone to remember the dead of both sides.

The pointlessness of wars and the needless dead were the overwhelming message.

Then, before more news of yet another dead soldier in Afghanistan (they don't tell us news of the dead Mujahadeen) we had Gordon Brown on to waffle how the dead of WW1 sacrificed all so we could live in a democracy!

WHAT A TWIT. And I cleaned that up.

These idiots, these wilful poltroons, these profiteering pygmies, these bureaucratic cowards, these lying war-mongers... these war criminals par excellence just do not get it!

Not one soldier died in WW1 "for democracy."

Just as not one soldier dies in Afghanistan to "defend our country."

More meaningless wars by which the politicians get back-handers, bribes and positions. More cannon fodder are sent to die in the name of "democracy" so an elected oligarchy, kept in place by a corrupt party system an a subservient media run by a handful of moguls and robber-barons, can keep us all in debt to the banking system and under the heel of an alien freemasonry.

A man like Harry Patch knew the terror as well as the meaningless of war.

he knew that whilst the politicos preach the "brotherhood of man" they send of young men to kill others and die for the politicos petty war games and business cartels.

yet still the Gordon Browns, Tony Blairs, Geoff Hoons and all the other lying bastards - with full pockets! - have the brass neck to waffle on about "democracy."

To return to a favourite theme of mine just last week the war criminal Geoff Hoon prattled on, on the BBC's Question Time programme about protecting citizens. I think one of the Milliband brothers did the same the other week too (on the Andrew Marr Show... anyway, you get the idea).

How about protecting us from gun and drugs gangs in multi-culti England?
How about protecting us from stabbings and muggings in multi-ethnic inner cities?
How about protecting our ancient rights from prying bureaucrats in all levels of government?

or does this fable of "protecting the citizens" only come into their vocabulary when it's new police powers, new laws, the ever-present "Muslim terrorists" etc. etc.

In 1666 part of London burnt down in a terrible accident. On the official monument in London, it still has etched in the stone that "Catholics" were responsible.

yes - those nasty Catholics back then were the international terrorists out to destroy "freedom" and the secret police were adept at fabricating events, conning the gullible into acts, and torturing the innocent into lurid confessions. They also had a compliant Jewish print media on hand to embellish all kinds of rumours and propaganda against the 'terrorists' of the day...

Not much has changed you see.

Still we have a scapegoat designed to keep a corrupt 'elite' in power; still we have a foreign 'terror' threat to take our eyes off the threats to our own liberties at home (to protect us of course!).

As the last soldier of WW1 dies the same platitudes are read out by our politicians.

Will we ever learn?

I'm no Lunartic but...

I never used to pay much heed to the "moon landings" not being any kind of astronomer/astrologer or whatever those types call themselves.

Right: And first right over the next hill is the interstate to Las Vegas!

Steve Brady's articles in Nationalism Today about the wonders of space exploration bored me rigid.

I watched one of the "debunking" conspiracy series on those who believed the moon landings to be fake with an open mind, and to be honest it neither convinced nor repulsed me viz the idea of it all being staged in the Arizona [?] desert.

However, the more the media have rattled on about the 40th anniversary of Apollo 11 the more I find myself questioning the events of 40 years ago.

Not because of flickering flags, funny shadows, light/dark etc.

My point is this. There was a "space race" between the USA and USSR. This was a facet of the Cold War, in which all manner of black ops, psychological warfare and much else was carried out by both sides.

1969 was during the Vietnam War and in the shadow of the Cuban Missile Crisis. if you believe that the Feds lied and covered up, it was also just a few years after they had killed their own President to ensure that the Cold War - and actual wars! - continued.

So here's my point.

We have a Cold War at its height. The Soviets are in space. What a phenomenal way to "prove" that 'western democracy' is best by putting a man on the moon!

And here's the icing on the cake which I've been boring the sprogs with and anyone who walked within shouting distance this last week:

If they put men on the moon in 1969, why haven't they been back? To claim more of it for America (and "democracy").

If they could put men on the moon in 1969 using computers with less power than a modern mobile phone, why not go back and set-up bases... surely easier than building a "space station" because it would be fixed and static and less risk of losing men when they have to repair it.

It would also enable the Space-dudes to wander about, or zoom about on their wee buggies, taking readings on the moon.

What about a space telescope based on the moon eh?

That is why I believe the 1969 landings were faked. They were carried out to gain 'one up' on the Soviets - and whilst all kinds of satellites, manned flights and even probes have been sent to Mars etc. etc. man has not "gone back" to the moon.

It makes no sense.

Over and Out.

The Longest Hatred

Reporter feels mob's hate in the Holy City

'Humiliated and degraded'

By Anne Barker

ABC News July 6, 2009 (updated July 7)

JERUSALEM -- ABC's Middle East correspondent Anne Barker became caught
in violent street protests involving ultra-Orthodox Jews in Jerusalem at
the weekend. This is her graphic account of her ordeal.

As a journalist I've covered more than my share of protests. Political
protests in Canberra (Australia). Unions protesting for better
conditions. Angry, loud protests against governments, or against
perceived abuses of human rights.

I've been at violent rallies in East Timor. I've had rocks and metal
darts thrown my way. I've come up against riot police.

But I have to admit no protest - indeed no story in my career - has
distressed me in the way I was distressed at a protest in Jerusalem on
Saturday (July 4) involving several hundred ultra-Orthodox Jews. This
particular protest has been going on for weeks.

Orthodox Jews are angry at the local council's decision to open a
municipal carpark on Saturdays - or Shabbat, the day of rest for Jews.

It's a day when Jews are not supposed to do anything resembling work,
which can include something as simple as flicking a switch, turning on a
light or driving.

So even opening a simple carpark to accommodate the increasing number of
tourists visiting Jerusalem's Old City is highly offensive to Orthodox
Jews because it's seen as a desecration of the Shabbat, by encouraging
people to drive.

I was aware that earlier protests had erupted into violence on previous
weekends - Orthodox Jews throwing rocks at police, or setting rubbish
bins alight, even throwing dirty diapers or rotting rubbish at anyone
they perceive to be desecrating the Shabbat.

But I never expected their anger would be directed at me.

I was mindful I would need to dress conservatively and keep out of
harm's way. But I made my mistake when I parked the car and started
walking towards the protest, not fully sure which street was which. By
the time I realised I'd come up the wrong street it was too late.

I suddenly found myself in the thick of the protest - in the midst of
hundreds of ultra-Orthodox Jews in their long coats and sable-fur hats.
They might be supremely religious, but their behavior - to me - was far
from charitable or benevolent.

As the protest became noisier and the crowd began yelling, I took my
recorder and microphone out of my bag to record the sound. Suddenly the
crowd turned on me, screaming in my face. Dozens of angry men began
spitting on me.

Spit like rain

I found myself herded against a brick wall as they kept on spitting - on
my face, my hair, my clothes, my arms.

It was like rain, coming at me from all directions - hitting my
recorder, my bag, my shoes, even my glasses.

Big gobs of spit landed on me like heavy raindrops. I could even smell
it as it fell on my face.
Somewhere behind me - I didn't see him - a man on a stairway either
kicked me in the head or knocked something heavy against me.

I wasn't even sure why the mob was angry with me. Was it because I was a
journalist? Or a woman? Because I wasn't Jewish in an Orthodox area? Was
I not dressed conservatively enough?

In fact, I was later told, it was because using a tape-recorder is
itself a desecration of the Shabbat even though I'm not Jewish and don't
observe the Sabbath.

It was lucky that I don't speak Yiddish. At least I was spared the
knowledge of whatever filth they were screaming at me.

As I tried to get away I found myself up against the line of riot police
blocking the crowd from going any further.

Israeli police in their flak jackets and helmets, with rifles and
shields, were yelling just as loudly back at the protesting crowd. I
found them something of a reassurance against the angry, spitting mob.

I was allowed through, away from the main protest, although there were
still Orthodox Jews on the other side, some of whom also yelled at me,
in English, to take my recorder away. Normally I should have stayed on
the sidelines to watch the protest develop.

But when you've suffered the humiliation and degradation of being spat
on so many times - and you're covered in other people's spit - it's not
easy to put it to the back of your mind and get on with the job. I left
down a side street and walked the long way back to the car, struggling
to hold back the tears. (End quote)

Read JUDAISM DISCOVERED by Michael Hoffman

Simon Sheppard and Stephen Whittle Convicted

If anyone thinks I was 'over the top' in recently denouncing "7/7" and the whole "war on terror" conspiracy debacle, note that the government offers up a "counter-terrorism" expert.

I was never aware that holding politiocal opinions or debating history was tantamount to "terrorism."

Is the government, like the Masonic ADL, now saying that anything that questions Zionist power, Zionist war propaganda etc. is "terrorism?"

Have hundreds of years of English legal tradition been flushed away by a system subserviant to a form of political control-freakery responsible for needless wars, mass murder, enslavement to the banks, usury debt, mass unemployment etc.?

BBC Friday July 10

SHEPPARD GETS FOUR YEARS

They looked like a pair of cranks straight out of a Louis Theroux documentary.

One was an unrepentant woman hater whose racist and anti-Semitic views were too hard-line even for the British National Party.

The other, his long-haired sidekick, sought the protection of a pseudonym that he used to make extremist rants.

Their hunger to stir up controversy saw them flee from justice in the north of England and stage an unlikely claim for political asylum in Los Angeles.

But their journey has now ended with jail sentences in the UK.

Jurors at Leeds Crown Court decided neo-Nazis Simon Sheppard and Stephen Whittle were not just harmless oddballs, but dangerous propagandists dedicated to whipping up racism.

On Friday, Sheppard was jailed for four years, 10 months and Whittle for two years, four months.

In a landmark case, they have become the first Britons to be convicted of inciting racial hatred online, having printed leaflets and controlled websites featuring racist material.

'Obnoxious and abhorrent'

The court heard the investigation into the pair began when a complaint about an anti-Semitic comic book called Tales of the Holohoax was made to the police in 2004 after it was pushed through the door of a synagogue in Blackpool, Lancashire.

It was traced back to a post office box in Hull registered to Sheppard, 51, a former BNP organiser kicked out of the far-right party after he was jailed in 2000 for distributing a racially inflammatory election leaflet.

The spotlight fell on the publishing activities of Sheppard, of Selby, North Yorkshire, a self-styled "scientific publisher", whose online ramblings took in a hatred of women and a morbid fixation with cannibalism.

But a police investigation discovered that his prime motivation was racism and he dedicated himself to producing what prosecutors called "obnoxious and abhorrent'' books, pamphlets and web pages.

What they are not entitled to do is to publish or distribute those opinions to the public in a threatening, abusive or insulting manner either intending to stir up racial hatred or in circumstances where it is likely racial hatred will be stirred up Mari Reid, CPS Counter Terrorism Division

On his website, Sheppard employed Whittle, 42, of Preston, Lancashire, as a columnist under the pseudonym "Luke O'Farrell".

Although their vitriol was variously directed at black, Asian and other non-white people, most of the material shown to the jury was virulently anti-Semitic.

The language and racial slurs used by the pair cannot be repeated here, but some of the excerpts presented to the court offered a flavour of their discourse.

One leaflet claimed that Auschwitz had not really been the location of industrial mass murder but had been, instead, a holiday camp provided by a benevolent Nazi regime for Europe's Jewish population.

Jonathan Sandiford, prosecuting, told the jury that it held up survivors of the Holocaust to "ridicule and contempt", accusing them of lying about the genocide of six million Jews.

Another story was illustrated with photographs of dead Jews. Sheppard also wrote that Holocaust victim Anne Frank's diary was "evil".

Reviewing lawyer Mari Reid, of the Crown Prosecution Service's counter-terrorism division, said members of the public were entitled under the law to hold racist and extreme views.

But she added: "What they are not entitled to do is to publish or distribute those opinions to the public in a threatening, abusive or insulting manner either intending to stir up racial hatred or in circumstances where it is likely racial hatred will be stirred up."

Thrown out

The defence argued that the online material did not fall under the jurisdiction of UK law, because Sheppard's site was hosted on servers in California.

But in a landmark ruling, the judge dismissed this - potentially paving the way for further prosecutions against the owners of other hate sites who believe they are exploiting a legal loophole.

Jurors, too, rejected the defence's claim that the pair's writings were merely satirical.

Sheppard was found guilty of 11 offences and Whittle was found guilty of five offences in July 2008.

Sheppard was found guilty of a further five charges in January 2009.

But the pair were not in court to hear the verdicts against them.

Before the jury in the first trial could return verdicts, both men fled to Los Angeles International airport and attempted to claim political asylum.

But their bid was thrown out by an immigration judge, and they were held at Santa Ana prison in California until they were returned to the UK to serve their sentences.

The irony of two racists attempting to exploit the immigration and asylum system was lost on no-one who followed the case.

Internet Fraud: It's an Israeli Thing!

Israel keeps its dubious crown

By Guy Griml

haaretz.com

Israel has much to be proud of, but one dubious distinction it might prefer to do without is that the People of the Book have the highest proportion of hackers per Internet user in the world.

The United States sports the highest absolute number of denial of service attacks. But Israel boasts the most malicious mischief per surfer in the world.

In a recent report on Internet security threats around the world during the first half of 2007, virus buster Symantec claimed that 11 percent of the computers used by Israeli surfers are directly responsible for online attacks and other hacker mischief.

Second to Israel in proportion of hackers is Canada, followed by the U.S. At least some things change: In the last Symantec report, on the second half of 2006, Israel still placed first in hackers per user (with 9 percent), but the second and third places were held by Taiwan and Poland.

In 2004, Israel was in fifth place. It has come a long way.

Another type of malware, or malicious software, is "software robots," popularly known as bots.

These uncharming pieces of malware usually arrive via spam emails (you know the type - "Boy do I have a deal for you. Pink Viagra and it really works!") What the bots do is comb through your hard disk seeking out information about you. Sometimes, they also help the perpetrator steal your identity, not for the sake of playing games, but to clean you out. And that doesn't mean your kitchen cupboards.

Symantec says that China has the most bot-infected computers, but Israel is in third place, with 3 percent.

Don't blame Petah Tikva for that paltry showing. In the Symantec ranking of cities with the most bot-infected computers, Petah Tikva places second in the whole of the EMEA (Europe, the Middle East and Africa). That is quite an achievement, given that in the previous report, on the second half of 2006, Petah Tikva was in ninth place.

The city of Haifa can command respect, too: It is in tenth place in the EMEA, up from twelfth place in the previous half year.

Why do Petah Tikva and Haifa rank so high? Chiefly because these two cities host the headquarters of Internet service providers - Internet Gold in Petah Tikva and NetVision in Haifa.

A worrying aspect of the Symantec report is that cybercrime seems to be not only spreading, but becoming more professional. It is no longer a question of some sickly pale megagenius kid sitting in his parents' basement hacking into the Pentagon: The company found a rising number of cyber-criminals using advanced tools to perpetrate malicious attacks.

---

Finally, meet the Nigerian scammers!! They are Israelis...

July 5, 2009

The Tel Aviv police fraud squad arrested on Sunday nine Israelis on suspicion of netting millions of dollars from U.S. pensioners in a so-called Nigerian scam.

Afghan War: Zionists Sent Our Troops to Die

Afghanistan is a needless, pointless war: as far as we in the UK are concerned.

For the powerful elites in Washington DC and Tel Aviv it's a different mater of course.

So we have to ask ourselves, why should our troops - including teenage boys - be put out as cannon fodder?

It is a Zionist war! We have no interests in it. End of.

When "9/11" happened and America started attacking Afghanistan, with the backing of a supine Westminster regime, some "patriots" immediately supported them.

On the back of the "911" lies they whipped up support for a 'war on Islam' because this was the path they were starting down, a road that would see them marching in step with Neo Cons, Zionists and other enemies of Britain and our interests.

At that time we went against the (perceived!) grain by putting out a colour leaflet (with the popular "US Govt. Under Zionist Control" sticker design on the bottom of it).

I don't have a copy to hand (but I do have one in a file somewhere in the depths...) but the leaflet made circa ten or a dozen key points against the Afghan War, points that could not be denied by any serious thinking nationalist.

It was as a result of this leaflet that the Kosher Patriots back-peddled and changed their story.

"Islamofascism" was still the number one threat (a lie not borne out by subsequent events, especially the global economic crash, caused by Zionist banksters in America -- clearly part of the main threat to our stability and well-being) but they were forced to admit that foreign wars were wrong and that no British lives should be put on the line.

Of course this new line made no sense, because if you really do believe that "Militant Islam" is the threat to world peace, then you would (still) support the war in Afghanistan because our troops are out there fighting Muslims, and Muslims that oppose the New World Order, Israel and the whole package.

I have condemned and exposed (yuch!) David Aaronovitch for his gung-ho approach to the War on Terror [sic], and even he is now trying to water-down his history in these matters (see recent post) but at least he still supports the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq (though with tacked-on hypocritical caveats).

Those who back the Neo-Con verbage re. Clash of Civilisations and the War on Terror yet who found it "unpopular" to support the Zionist Wars and so back-tracked are even worse, because they do not even have the courage of their own convictions!

Those of us who saw through 911, who have always condemned militant Zionism as the threat to world peace, who have always pointed to he Zionist role in usury-banking as the threat to lives, homes, jobs etc., those of us who have condemned the ghost-outfit Al Qaeda as a CIA set-up etc. etc. have no such qualms.

Not one British, not one European (yes... not even one American!) life should be put on the line for illegal, Zionist wars.

It is as simple as that.

But in opposing British involvement in foreign wars, we must join-the-dots.

If we oppose Zionist Wars we must oppose the entire War on Terror.

To do otherwise is to excel in hypocrisy.

The family of each and every dead and maimed soldier deserve better than that.




I believe this video deals with the time when our own 'Mid East Envoy' was one Lord Levy! The man of the peerages for cash scandal: Lord Cashpoint himself.

Now ask yourself this: who runs the "free world" [sic]; who runs the banking system; who runs Hollywood; who runs the media.

Muslims?

Er.... no.

Journalists Who Argued for Illegal Wars Should Face Trial

There is hypocrisy and there is bare-faced cheek... then there is something more.

Right: Like all court historians and journalists Aaronovitch earns his shilling by attacking the enemies of his masters. As well as defending illegal Zionist wars across the Middle East -- yet not wishing to put himself on the front line! -- he also produced this tome, which wraps up real history with crank history, so any idea of "Zionist power" is as 'crazy,' in his works, as Dan Brown's gnostic theories.

The Jews have a word for it: chutzpah [drop the c and you've pretty much got the phonetic pronouncement].

Chutzpah is when someone kills your mum, makes you pay them for the coffin and then comes round every day to help you spend your inheritance on items which they then walk off with... only to sell back to you at a later date at an inflated price on HP which you can by then ill afford, only to repossess your house for your failure to keep up the HP payments. he'd probably then offer to rent your ex-home to you at twice the going rate.

Our politicians are quite good at chutzpah. So were the banks (sub-prime mortgages etc.). So are quite a few media talking-heads.

Imagine Tony Blair, invader of Iraq and co-author of the "War on Terror" stitch-up being made the Mid East's "peace envoy."

That's chutzpah.

OK, you can put your note books away now. Lesson's over.

Last night on the BBC's Politics Show I witnessed possibly one of the worst cases of chutzpah in recent months.

A journalist said that we do not want to be in Afghanistan, but now there we must see it through.

Nothing strange there as a few politicos (e.g. a Lib Dem -- who have been critical of recent wars -- on the BBC's Question Time said much the same last night).

However when you think of how said this particular statement (i.e. we should send in more troops though we may not like it) you realise how we are being spun yet another line by a bunch of apologists for mass murder who care not a jot how many body bags come back to be saluted by the population of Wootten Bassett as they pass through in yet another flag-draped funeral cortage.

You see the reporter in question was one David Aaronovitch.

"Who he?" you might ask.

Well, the reporter tends to work for The Independent, and when the whole "9/11" and "War on terror" mess was being rolled out to a credulous population, Mr. Aaronovitch was the key 'left-wing' cheerleader for the Zionist policy of war against Afghanistan, Iraq and anyone else that America-UK-Israel deemed a "threat."

When we were all smelling a rat with the Zionists' lies, half-truths and war propaganda, Mr. Aaronovitch was out there in media land banging the drum for Bush and Blair.

Many journalists, talking heads and "experts" (all of which labels could have been applied to Aaronovitch at the time) take the shilling off the spooks (MI6, CIA or Mossad) and are used in that respect. They are put about the TV studios to give the spin their paymasters want on any given situation.

if you have ever read any serious book on the spooks you will know journalists, professors and similar are often kept on the payroll for such situations.

After all - why risk any free-thinker or someone hostile to their agenda getting the limelight (though this happens of course) when you can at least try and balance up the odds more than a little by employing X number of "experts?"

Now I do not know Mr. Aaronovitch (I'll take that as a badge of honour!) but his gung-ho approach to the "War on Terror" and his backing of a seemingly "right-wing" Neo-Con series of adventures had all the hallmarks of being a service to his paymasters.

After all, he can't have won many fans in the left-wing, Independent-reading luvvie circles he would normally associate with.

As an aside we should always remember that it was to Mr. Aaronovitch that Mr. Griffin announced that his mission to "turn around" the BNP was going to be a stage-by-stage affair (he likened it to turning around a sea-going super-tanker, i.e. it would need a very wide arc and be a slow process).

Why would a left-wing ultra-Zionist give such an open forum to one of the supposed "fascist" opposition, with all its cosy talk of waiting at stations, popping in the butchers, genteel car rides et al? After all, there is no such thing as a free lunch (also enjoyed if I recall correctly).

But back to business.

Does the warmongering Zionist apologist for Cheney, Rummy and Bush really think we have such short-term memories? I may forget where I put my keys on an almost daily basis... but I tend to remember the low-lives who made all the excuses for a needless Zionist war in the UK media: and it would be hard to forget the central role undertaken by Mr. Aaronovitch.

There is bare-faced cheek and then there is chutzpah.

Mr. Aaronovitch knows what chutzpah is, and not just because he is a well-educated (I don't know where he went to school, but I'll bet it wasn't a local run-of-the-mill affair!) astute journalist.

I also do not know if Mr. Aaronovitch has ever lived in the illegal bandit-state that is the cause of so much of the Neo Con's (oxy-)moronic philosophy and warmongering, though the truth of the matter is of course that he has the "right" to "return" there (unlike all the Palestinians forced out via ethnic cleansing, state-sponsored terrorism and all the rest of it).

In stating that we may not want to be in Afghanistan, but must now get on with the job Mr. Aaronovitch is rubbing our nose in the Neo-Con fecal aftermath.

He did want us out there. He did make excuses for the warmongers. He did want our troops used as canon-fodder for a Zionist policy that would result in yet more terror (CIA-inspired or copycat).

If and when war crimes trials are held for Afghanistan and Iraq -- as they surely must if we live in a free and fair world (I know, stop laughing) -- just as they were for the Germans and Serbians amongst others, then I hope the role of bought-and-paid-for politicians and journalists will be at centre stage.

After all if the "I was only following orders" defence was of no use in the quasi-Soviet show trials of 1946, then they cannot be used to dodge the death penalty (aw... go on!) when Blair, Bush, Rummy, Aaronovitch and their ilk are in the dock.

Now... where did I put my keys.


Link:
Ex-Communist Aaronovitch Attacked AntiWar.Com
Aaronovitch Supported Iraq War and Israel's Gaza War Crimes

9/11's 'War on Terror' Delivered the Police State

If anyone thinks the "War on Terror," "Al Qaeda," "9/11," "7/7" and all the rest of the awful Americanisms so bandied about by our willing media (BBC, Murdoch-owned and other) were just good v. bad, or simple aspects of a naturally occurring 'terrorism' they are fools at best, willing dupes or just plain evil opportunists at worst.

World Zionism, Global Freemasonry, the New World Order... call it what you will: it has organised, cajoled, used agent provocateurs, whipped up a scared, compliant or ambivalent media.

Think I'm wide of the mark?

Watch this week's Panorama (still on BBC i-player) and you will see how we have become a very real police state with all kinds of legal demonstrations and justifiable political campaigning all but labelled "terrorism" with the knee-jerk ill thought out "anti-terror" legislation, blindly accepted by our money-grubbing politicos, used to scare, frighten, silence and otherwise target legitimate campaigners.

Since when does the state have the right to take the picture/video and name/details of every single person on a legal demonstration (as I know from one National Front friend they did a couple of years back as NF members disembarked from a coach).

We live in a police state.

That is what 9/11 and all the rest of the nonsense was all about.

And as more body bags come out of Afghanistan as we, the new Soviets, fight the Mujahadeen 1.2 we are still told we are fighting for "democracy" and even "wymmins rights" in Afghanistan.

That must be why we invaded Burma, North Korea, China, Saudi Arabia, Israel... and all the other nations that use lethal force against their own people and neighbours in contravention of international law.

So please, fellow nationalist, open your eyes.

See beyond the media headlines. See through the "patriots" who serve the NWO agenda by trying to ally us with Israeli interests. See past the "War on terror" claptrap and the lies that our countrymen are dying in Afghanistan to "defend us" or "defend democracy."

We are being ushered into a police state. The "Al Qaeda" bogeyman has been used to silence those who protest against new labour, big business - and much more.

Anti-terror legislation was used to freeze Icelandic assets when the whole 'Credit Crunch' hit.

Now Panorama makes it clear that as well as the whole DNA database scandal and the government's attempt to keep a database on all our children, the police are now keeping all info on any innocent, law-abiding demonstrators for many years.

The Credit Crunch began when Zionist bankers and shysters in America started profiteering from poor communities by charging exorbitant rates of usury even beyond the "accepted norm."

The "War on Terror" started because our Zionist masters wanted "the West" to become far more active in the Mid East for Israeli interests, as well as enabling them to push through scandalous legislation such as the "Patriot Act" [sic] to spy, keep records, and silence more of us.

Quid Pro Quo, mon ami, Quid Pro Quo.

Distributist Conference on the Global Economic Crisis

Katyn Massacre: Communism's Epoch

Michael Jackson - the Canonised Saint of the New World Order

MICHAEL JACKSON:

WHITEFACE STAR OF THE ALCHEMICAL MINSTREL SHOW

by Michael Hoffman | June 26, 2009
http://revisionistreview.blogspot.com/2009/06/michael-jackson-whiteface-star-of.html


We pause in our round-the-clock defamation of Iran to bring you,

Michael Jackson.

Our Zionist-controlled media have temporarily shifted from hysterical
denunciation of Iran to pious genuflection before the altar of an androgyne.

To the extent that Iran has been demonized, Mr. Jackson is being
canonized -- as "the" iconic American entertainer. How strange and at
the same time, revelatory.

No white actor may wear blackface today, but Mr. Jackson--who

reputedly was once a Black man--wore permanent whiteface thanks

to modern surgery and chemicals. His visage was reportedly collapsing

faster than his finances. Where are the photos? Why the cover-up?

I don't lament the demise of blackface "entertainment" by white per-

formers, for, as William N. Grimstad documents in his classic work,
"Talk About Hate," the lowbrow shtick of vaudeville and movie "coon
song" blackface was a Judaic art-form perfected by Sophie Kalish
("Sophie Tucker" the "World-renowned coon-shouter"), Asa Yoelson

("Al Jolson"), Edward Israel Iskowitz ("Eddie Cantor") and Joe Yule

("Mickey Rooney"), promoted by moguls like Louis Lazar ("Louis B.

Mayer") and Max Aronson ("Bronco Billy Anderson"), and such early

Zionist movie studios as Selig Polyscope.

Jackson was a mirror image of this degraded process, only instead of
white greasepaint he resorted to permanent bleach. Was he a Black
impersonation of a White transvestite? Or was his alchemy an elaborate
fantasy-in-life--a desire to deceive himself into thinking he had actually

become a kind of public White aristocrat? In the midst of the idolatry

that has followed his death, no one seems to be asking these questions,

even as Jackson is portrayed as the focus of the adulation of Blacks the

world over. If that's the case, one can only conclude that most Blacks

wish they were White. Yet that conclusion seems dubious, to say the

least.

Jackson was the first race-change personality on the world stage.

Sad to say, he was sick physically, mentally and spiritually. From his
dalliances with young boys to his occult persona as "Captain Eo,"

he was the exoteric manifestation of the esoteric putrefaction exuded

by a rootless, soulless, deracinated and boastful capitalist System,

which demands that conservative nations like Iran follow its degenerate
example or face media-generated hate and if all else fails, Israeli bombs.

The same talking head moralists who saw little but wretched evil in the
Muslim Iranian government, adore Jackson as if he were the Second
Coming. It is even said that Mr. Jackson was "The voice of America."
Jackson as ambassador and voice of the USA? Perhaps in this 21st

century, but not in the preceding one; that distinction is still held by the
classically educated Harry Lillis "Bing" Crosby, who sold more records
than Elvis and the Beatles combined, was a star of radio and movies,
winner of the Academy Award, and a culture-bearer, not a culture-

distorter.

Jackson is not fit to shine Crosby's golf clubs and I say that not because

Jackson was a once and future African-American hermaphrodite and
pederast in whiteface. Crosby promoted talented Black singers and
entertainers throughout his career, and rightly so. Satchmo and Nat
would have rushed Jackson to the nearest priest or shrink and pitied and
prayed for him along the way.

Today Jackson is the god of the Chamber-of-Commerce-dump-for-

cheap-labor-Chinese-junk, otherwise known as the USA. Jackson

symbolizes the "joys" of our "capitalist way of life:" the freedom to

scarf hormonally-enhanced chicken at KFC while watching your ten-

year-old daughter have her childhood stolen by Hannah Montana and

"Madonna."

Way out here in the boonies of north Idaho, where this writer makes

his home, it's not exactly Norman Rockwell country anymore. As Brer

Rabbitt said when asked if he knew of a place so far away there was

no trouble, "There ain't no place that far away." Idaho certainly has its

share of modern troubles. But many of the people of Idaho are com-

mitted nonetheless to reviving the America of old that God once shed

His grace upon, and the sudden reanimation of the Michael Jackson

circus strikes us as perverted and delusional.

If Jackson is the face of America, then America no longer exists, except
in places like Idaho and Montana--while New York and Hollywood

bear the same relation to America that Michael Jackson's collapsing nose

and bleached skin do to the proud Black men and women he insulted

with his mission of becoming the leopard that can change his spots and the
Ethiopian who can change his skin.

But let us not feel smug or superior. We live in a scientific era where
cloned meat and genetically-altered corn are fed to our children; where
"pro-life" Republicans massacre Muslim and Arab civilians; where the
worst ideas are touted as the best ideas; where heads is tails. In such
a Mixmaster milieu, why wouldn't Black be White, and male be a simulacra
of female, and Michael Jackson the king of American culture and the star
of the alchemical minstrel show that has become a religion for the masses?

Copyright©2009 RevisionistHistory.org

Hoffman is a former reporter for the Associated Press and the author of
"Judaism Discovered," a book banned by Amazon.com

Spinning the Jewishness of Bernie Madoff

Spinning the Jewishness of Bernie Madoff

by Andrew Anderson

http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/authors/Anderson-Madoff.html

June 29, 2009

In the weeks before Bernie Madoff’s sentencing to what amounts to a life sentence, the professional “spin doctors” at various Jewish advocacy organizations were doubtless working overtime. They know that his sentencing will be the top story in many media outlets around the world. Their goal is to distance Madoff and his crimes as far as possible from the public perception of Jewishness, and to distance Jews, in general, as far as possible from the current global economic collapse.

David Harris, the Executive Director of the American Jewish Committee, exhibited this type of concern last December 21 in a letter to the New York Times in which he chastised the Jewish-owned newspaper for publishing an article that made the following passing reference to Madoff’s Jewishness:

He was thought of as a great philanthropist, a pillar of the community, the chairman of Nasdaq — all of that stuff,” said one hedge fund executive who knew him.

There was a joke around that Bernie was actually the Jewish T-bill,” the executive went on, referring to the ultrasecure investment of treasury bills. “He was that safe.”

Mr. Madoff had traveled far from his roots in eastern Queens, where as a young man he cobbled together a $5,000 grubstake from his earnings as a lifeguard and sprinkler installer to start the famed investment firm that eventually bore his name, Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities.

He had come to move easily in the clubby Jewish world that iterates between New York City and its suburbs and southern satellites like Palm Beach.

Indeed, in the world of Jewish New York, where Mr. Madoff, 70, was raised and found success, he is largely still considered as a macher: a big-hearted big shot for whom philanthropy and family always intertwined with — and were equally as important as — finance.

Harris’ letter to the Times took them to task for “a striking emphasis on [Madoff’s] being Jewish. It was not just once, or twice, but at least three times before the article continued inside. Why?” Harris and other Jewish public relations gurus would like to deny the relevance of Madoff’s Jewishness. Some of their tactics have been

1. to suggest that Madoff’s victims were primarily Jews, hence transforming a story about a Jewish perpetrator into a story about Jewish victims;

2. to argue that Jews are not any more likely to do the sorts of things Madoff did than anyone else;

3. to equate any suggestion that there is an inherent Jewish tendency toward financial misconduct with “anti-Semitism.”

However, anyone even remotely familiar with the recent history of Wall Street criminality would readily acknowledge the futility of tactics 1 and 2 above. The names of Ivan Boesky, Dennis Levine, Michael Milken, Sandy Weill, Jack Grubman and Sam Israel should be sufficient to establish a history of corrupt behavior, while the more recent antics of Richard Fuld, Ace Greenberg,James Cayne, Roland Arnall, and Robert Rubin should be sufficient to establish a central Jewish presence in the current global economic collapse. The little-known career of Ameriquest sub-prime finagler extraordinaire andWiesenthal Center co-founder Roland Arnall alone provides a solid basis for establishing Jewish complicity. The level of complicity becomes even more apparent when one considers that Jews make up less than 3% of the generalU.S. population.

If the facts will become known, it will be only tactic #3 above that will confront informed Gentiles — the charge of anti-Semitism. It is high time that Americaand the world find the courage to openly discuss the facts of Jewish nepotism and hyper-ethnocentrism, as well as a tendency toward financial corruption and exploitation. These issues must be addressed and resolved in a professional manner, if we can ever hope to restore some semblance of national and global economic viability.

Andrew Anderson is a retired businessman.

Uri Geller, Michael Jackson and the ADL

So let's understand this. Jackson had two Jewish children and a close Jewish friend.

And yet the Masonic-Zionist Jewish-racist Mossad-front, the ADL, still labelled him an "anti-Semite."

Is there no depths to which they won't plummet to garner donations?

---

sorry - no details of article origins...

'I rowed with Jacko over anti-Semitism'

As he tried to come to terms with the death of Michael Jackson, a distraught Uri Geller spoke to TJ today about the allegations of anti-Semitism that dogged his late friend.

The 50-year-old singer, who had two Jewish children - Paris and Prince with his ex-wife Debbie Rowe - fell foul of the community twice in his career, firstly in 1995 with the release of They Don't Care About Us, which included the line 'Jew me, sue me, everybody do me'.

The second occasion came in 2005 during a court case. An answerphone message Jackson had allegedly left in 2003 was played during proceedings in which the singer, referring to Jews, said: "They suck... they're like leeches... It's a conspiracy. The Jews do it on purpose."

Describing the comments as "hateful", Abraham H Foxman of the Anti-Defamation League said: "It seems every time he has a problem in his life he blames it on Jews. It is sad that Jackson is infected with classically stereotypical ideas of Jews as all-powerful, money-grubbing and manipulative."

He also claimed Jackson had an "anti-Semitic streak".

However, Geller, said Michael regretted those words, noting that the singer even acted as best man, wearing a kippah, when the celebrity psycic renewed his wedding vows.

Recalling the allegations of anti-Semitism, Geller said: "I had rows with Michael Jackson about that, when I heard that, I tried to wash Michael Jackson out of my mind and I said it a few times to the press that I don't want anything to do with Michael Jackson when I heard that.

"Michael called me many times to make me believe that that was not what he meant, I believed him. I don't want to even go there now because he is no longer around and I have to respect the Michael Jackson that I knew."

He added: "I can tell you is that I am still in a state of shock, I'm saddened, I can't believe that Michael Jackson is gone. He was my best man when I renewed my wedding vows with Hannah. Rabbi Shmuley Boteach was there. I remember Michael wearing a kippah.

"It is just devastating to face the reality that he is dead. I hope that Michael Jacksonwill be remembered with dancing, for his lyrics, songs and his music.

"He will be remembered as the idol, the icon, the legend and the phenomenon that made Michael Jackson who he was".

BBC Attacks '7/7' Truth-Seekers

Last night the BBC (which we used to fondly call Blair's Bolshevik Corporation) ran a part of its series The Conspiracy Files (Series Two).

It dealt with what has annoyingly (and Americanly!?!?) been labeled "7/7" - aka the "Muslim Terror Bomb Attacks in London."

The programme dealt primarily with a video called "7/7 The Ripple Effect" which we've linked to on the next post so you can go see it yourself.

Interestingly The Ripple Effect Video (TRE) has as a main part of its thesis that BBC is used and abused by the security services to disseminate lies about 7/7 and the whole "War on Terror" debacle.

Lo and behold the BBC spends an hour attacking TRE and those who have loosely coalesced around it.

The BBC "discovered" the man behind it (who gave them that info? MI5?), a man who is now in jail in Ireland awaiting extradition.

Another "doubter/revisionist" was smeared because he wrote a piece "denying" the holohoax.

It all smells of the usual fayre dished up by the Neo-Cons, BBC, government and spooks.

They pull apart small parts of TRE whilst ignoring some key issues (not least the fact that 3 of the "suicide bombers" were reported as being shot by the spooks at Canary Wharf!!!).

Still the BBC in being forced to come to the aid of their political bosses have highlighted TRE and will have ensured that hundreds of thousands more look up the video online.

Any nationalist who thinks the spooks are not capable of setting up patsies and setting off their own explosives are at best naive.

Watch TRE (linked below) and watch the BBC's The Conspiracy Files (available on iplayer at the BBC website) and think for yourself.

The woman who seems to be the "victims' mouthpiece" who takes the official line thinks it dishonours the dead to ask questions.

This is a line that holohoax officials use.

It is a lie.

The dead are dead. If anything, asking questions and truth-seeking is to honour them because if there are lies being peddled about how and why they died that dishonours their memory!

If I was murdered and an innocent man jailed for the crime, whilst the guilty walked free I know I would want the facts looked into and the guilty found and dealt with.

We must be free to ask questions, however unpleasant, however unpalatable to the government's pet BBC.

Does the fact that the BBC knowingly and unknowingly employs criminals, paedophiles, drunkards, adulterers and those who uphold bizarre religious (or anti-religious) theories make all their news coverage untrue or unpalatable?

No.

yet we are told that TRE etc. is unpalatable because of its authors religious outlook and one of its supporter's revisionist views on history.

Thanks BBC.

You have merely confirmed that you are a government agency out to smear anything that really looks into the whys and wherefores of the NWO, just as you will not ask the questions about the banking crisis, or the Bilderbergers, who owns the media etc. etc.

It certainly makes the questions over the BBC's reporting of events in Iran fall into focus!

On the programme the BBC reporter bewails that (the "discredited") TRE is "damaging trust in the British government."

Oh boo hoo!

7/7 - Ripple Effect Video