What have Obama and (our Stalinesque "dear leader") Gordon Brown got in common?
Right: Do you really think that Obama or McCain, Brown, Miliband or Cameron will offer any actual difference to the status quo outside of their sloganeering?
Yes, they both claim to be lefties, and both claim to be "against the war" whilst they (will) both knuckle down and do the bidding of our masonic overlords viz the banking system and Zionist inspired wars (whether in relation to Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran, Lebanon, Georgia or wherever else the Zionists meddle).
They also, much the chagrin of anyone with even a cluster of braincells left (after watching TV, reading newspapers and/or drinking the water!) insist on vomiting forth the word "change" as part of an attempt to bamboozle the simple and the bewildered (I'll leave the calculations as the percentages involved up to you dear reader) into acquiescing into yet another vote given to a hand-picked hoary son of the lodges.
Oh yes, it's all "change."
Change, change, change. Change! Change?
Yep. if we all keep saying it, we might just come around to believing it. Not!
Yet they must know something we don't. Are we to conclude that every 8 - 10 years people get conned into thinking that voting in 'the other lot' will somehow prove miraculous and answer all our problems?
OK, with Brown it was a p###-poor effort to try and avoid a switch to the Tories, but in the meantime the "Vote Blue, Get Green" Tories are doing a lot of "change" tactics themselves.
So vote Red or Blue at the next election and we'll get something new!
No more public schoolboys! No more cowards who do whatever International Zionism dictates. No more money-grubbers on the take!
Oh yeah. If you think any of the political parties will deliver that much change you are sorely mistaken!
Which brings me back around to the idea of change.
Change in and of itself is not a good thing. As the old saying goes, if it ain't broke don't fix it. The idea of continual change is something that politicians seem to need to justify continued coverage of their piffle, as well as an excuse for their continual need for new laws - whether to carry forward the liberal anti-moral agenda or to further their continual creep towards a police state.
Therein lies the difference though between a system stooge and the genuine nationalist.
We don't want "change."
We don't want a tweak here and a new law there.
What we need is revolution.
And before the usual crowd start bleating on about firing squads at dawn, I mean revolution as in complete and utter replacement of the current masonic system.
Right: If we do not oppose the machinations of world Zionism - in words and in a manner that 'Joe Bloggs' understands - then we offer no real alternative to the system stooges.
As GK Chesterton said, in a topsy turvy world, the traditionalist is the true revolutionary: and so it is with us.
It kind of falls back to the pre-war ideal of a New Man, or if you like the 80s expression 'the Political Soldier.'
- Is it so wrong to expect nationalism and nationalists to be free of cowboys and shysters?
- Is it so wrong to expect nationalism and nationalists to be free of drunkards and druggies?
- Is it so wrong to expect nationalism and nationalists to be free of degenerates and perverts?
- Is it so wrong to expect nationalism and nationalists to be free of Zionists, race-mixers and liberals?
Left: Martyn Gilleard. Race war dreamer and convicted paedophile. Is this what nationalism has descended to? It is time for nationalists to grow up and end the deviant behaviour of the few. Morality isn't an 'optional extra' for nationalists, it is an imperative for a movement that must show it is not just against the immoral few and the amoral system in its slogans and headlines, but in the policies and the lives of its militants. Whether it's druggies, swingers, adulterers or homosexuals: how can we as a movement offer anything new or different if we copy the moral abyss of the system and the sexual proclivities of the degenerates we claim to oppose?
It seems to me that over the last 10 years in a rush to be "acceptable" rather than approach the public with a popular message of national self-determination, debt-free finance, ecological advances to benefit all our communities, "the movement" has been taken for a ride by financial hucksters out to maximise their profits by selling out on race, Zionism, homosexuality -- and much else besides.
We need to (pardon the John Major imagery) get 'back to basics' and return nationalism to the nationalists.
I am not for one moment suggesting that we entertain the uniform fetishists or wannabe American "race war" loonies, any more than we should transform nationalism into some kind of patriotic old-fashioned Tory party or some kind of liberal hug-an-ethnic "community" group.
Yet we do seem, as a wider nationalist movement, to have lost sight of the essentials: and it is essentials that our grass roots clamour for, and it is these essentials that our beleaguered people are crying out for.
I sincerely believe we need:
- a movement that stands up to denounce needless international conflicts and false-flag ops like 911;
- a movement that demands independence and neutrality away from American and Israeli influence;
- a movement that promotes a healthy family-first Christianity;
- a movement that explains and promotes Distributism, usury-free banking and debt-free currency;
- a movement that offers genuine hope and help for our own people in every community to break free of drugs and anti-social behaviour whilst making it clear that "zero tolerance" of crime will be the norm;
- a movement that makes it clear that immigration and multi-culti has failed but that every kind of help - financial, moral and practical - will be given to non-Europeans to settle in their ancestral homelands, for the betterment of all;
- a movement that improves a genuine safety net of help of every kind to allow families to have genuine jobs, a genuine income and preferably work centred around family firms, family businesses, family farms etc. but does away with the "benefits for life" outlook;
- a movement that rewards those who are able to have large families within wedlock, because they will provide the workforce of tomorrow and the future for the country;
- a movement that promotes a genuine family of nations for Britain and Europe, whilst opposing the corrupt, bureaucratic, Socialistic and Masonic power structure in Brussels/Strasbourg.
By far and away more important than any of the above though is the need for the nationalist movement to get its own house in order.
Left: Pim Fortuyn was a successful politician and was held up as an example by those wishing to liberalise nationalism, partly because he took an extremely populist "Anti-Muslim" line. He was also a practicing homosexual who stated, on Dutch TV, that he wished to bugger an Arab boy - presumably as a service to multi-culturalism. Was he really an example to follow for nationalists as some would have us believe - or a degenerate scumbag with no real interest in nationalism or racialism?
We can have the best policies known to man; we can have all the answers to all the problems; but without genuine, decent people to promote and implement then this all means nothing.
I think it was Codreanu - and no doubt someone will correct me if I'm wrong - who said that his country was dying not from a lack of political manifestos, but from a lack of men!
The same is true for us.
We can all think of the shysters, the liars, the trouble-makers, the political gymnasts, the druggies and drunkards and the ne'erdowells that have continually and consistently dragged nationalism down.
Year in, year out the same brand of degenerates and outright scum have done more damage to the cause than hundreds of decent hardworking nationalists could ever dream of countering.
So, what message am I wishing to impart?
In bullet points it's this:
- Nationalism must return to its grass roots, albeit positive and engaging.
- Nationalism must offer real answers to our people, unafraid of the attacks it will face from vested interests.
- Nationalism must get its own house in order because how can a group including cowboys/shysters, druggies/drunkards, Zionists, homosexuals/degenerates, race-mixers, liberals etc. offer anything different to the political parties?
If Nationalism fails to do this it will remain in a ghetto, however "successful" compared to previous years. Furthermore, it will only be a matter of time before some scandal brings the whole house of cards crashing down. Worse still, if it continues to betray its grass roots and continues to place money on a pedestal before policy, it will be treated like the other parties: it will be hated, loathed and mistrusted (just ask "New Labour").
So there is plenty to discuss for nationalists.
Do we want real change - revolutionary change? Or do we want the stale old slogans of an Obama or a Brown?
Can we get our house in order? Even before we ever attempt even to save one village or town?
Can we offer people real (social, political and economic) answers to their problems? Or just mirror Daily Mail editorials to feed off a Neo-Con orchestrated hysteria?
Think about it nationalist.
Do you want crumbs from the top table? Or do you want to bring that top table crashing down along with all the public schoolboys, Zionists and Masons that sit around it as our people face a winter of discontent, hunger and cold?
Open your eyes.
4 comments:
An interesting post FC.
Tyndall said his one regret when founding the BNP was letting in one man who [and JT saw the proof] later turned out to be a police informer and general shit-stirrer throughout nationalist groups: Mark Cotterill.
I don't think we need to "name names" -- the general consensus should be no degenerates, no sell-outs and no splitters.
FC, may I congratulate on you putting together a very interesting and vitally important article.
Someone asked me the other day what drug I thought was the most damaging to society. I replied back television. This Satanic contraption is perfectly legal, its easily accessible and available 24/7 365 days a year and is watched by millions of people. It can control and mould peoples thoughts and opinions at the touch of a button. The irony of all this is that in the 1970s there was a childrens' TV programme called Why Don't You? on in the summer holidays which used to say 'Why don't you turn off your TV and so something less boring instead'. Now children suckle the cathay ray tube and they are brainwashed and indoctrinated from day one.
The sickening irony of the 'democratic' process centres on the fact that politicians are supposed to be our (public) servants and we, the populous their masters! If only this was the case. As Belloc pointed out in The Party System Westminster is the problem and not the solution. Truth and justice never need to be maintained and/or 'changed' however lies and deceit need to be constantly maintained and 'changed' to confuse and bewilder the masses.
The fundamental problem centres on the fact that no party sufficiently mirrors the opinions and aspirations of the general public. The two main parties are at opposing ends of the political spectrum, whilst the average voter's opinions and views are a combination of the two. To further compound matters the vast majority of politicians are corrupt and fraudulent individuals who put the interests of big business and the Zionist international bankers above what is best for Britain and its citizens.
FC, unfortunately a hideous paradox comes into play with regard to this sickening scenario. I regard myself as a White Nationalist, however I know the enemy of mankind (not just the white race) are the Satanic beasts of the Zionist New World Order that wish to exterminate 90% of the world's population (all non-Jewish Goyim of course) and turn the planet into a global gulag. Is it case of 'Goyim of the World unite' or not?
As we know British society is imploding (courtesy of The Protocols of The Elders of Zion being implemented) and the Nationalist movement is heading towards an apocalyptic future. Society is morally and spiritually rotten to the core. You were right about the Codreanu quote. He also said:-
""We shall create a spiritual atmosphere, a moral atmosphere, in which the heroic man may be born and on which he can thrive. This hero will lead our people on the road of its greatness."
Unfortunately so many deluded BNP members think that the slimy odious Griffin is such a figure. Society as a whole has been reduced to a Godless consumerist dystopia and this greatly exacerbates the probability that present and future Nationalists will possess some of the symptoms of this Satanic pandemic.
FC, as you quite rightly say we need to get our house in order before we can move on. The frightening reality is that time is rapidly running out as the plans of the Zionist New World Order are being carried out at an alarming rate.
Nationalism without morality and principles is a gift for the enemies of the nation. How can we possibly build a better world for our respective peoples if we are ourselves as degenerate as those we seek to replace?
The Gilleard monster was thrown out of the BPP as soon as he admitted he was a paedophile. Sadly his pretentions towards being some kind of race warrior were not taken as reason to boot him out! No one can seriouusly believe terrorism is a viable and moral option. Was the BPP not expelling a wannabe terrorist an oversight? With the recent cuddling up to the loyalist BFF & RVF (!) that may be an expression of unrealistic idealism. I pray I am wrong.
Worse than the BPP's reaction, the NF have STILL not banned this beast. The leadership of the NF are loyalists, royalists and imperialists. This shows an unbelievable failure to grasp current political reality. Rubbing shoulders with the likes of Gilleard is beyond belief.
Our struggle must be to remould ourselves into better people so that we are worthy to lead our people out of the cesspool of the modern mamonist world. We must truly be Political Soldiers.
Narrow Nationalism which plays the parliamentary game is an irrelevance. The vast majority of laws in Britain are made in Brussels or in commitees with no recourse to a parliamentary vote. Our fight is against the apparatus of the New World Order - this is not a battle which respects, or even recognises, national borders.
The 9/11 lie must be exposed for what it is - an international act of aggression by the rulers against the ruled. Those who say 9/11 was an inside job are only partly right. It was a Zionist NWO job with cooperation across many nations - likewise with the attrocities in London, Madrid etc.
The Global Warming lie must be even more fervently fought against - this is the excuse the rulers are using to bring in a global tax to fund the One World Government.
We need to educate ourselves and then spread this knowledge. However we must not allow our enemies into our camp in order to boost membership numbers. That can only lead to us becoming the new 'them'. We must be constantly on our guard against replacing our masters at the cost of becoming them, as warned of by Orwell in Animal Farm.
Post a Comment