Saturday, 13 August 2011

David Starkey on Newsnight Quotes Enoch Powell's Rivers of Blood

On Twitter, on Radio 5 Live, the historian David Starkey is being pulled apart as a "bigot", "racist" and "ignorant" for stating that the riots have a racial character and that the white chavs are essentially "whiggers" -- i.e. have taken on black gangsta culture.

He has dared to say what so many screaming liberals have wanted covered up, that the gangsta culture, born in U.S. ghettos, with its gangsta rap and its baggy-arsed trousers and weirdly angled baseball hats, has been embraced by some white trash/chavs, and it is they who joined the gangstas in rioting: so it is a racial event, albeit gangstas and whiggers, whilst decent whites and blacks who still have the culture of their grandparents (hard-working, Christian etc.) look on appalled.

As we and others have said, the more generations removed from the Empire Windrush and all that, the worse things get because multi-culti destroys roots, heritage, cultures, decency, honesty, duty etc. and the results of the "melting pot" is to churn out gangstas with no respect for any authority, any culture, any history/heritage etc.

As David Starkey said "the chavs have become black" who speak patois, and strut about like gangstas (a typical example is the "white" bastard who stole from the Malaysian student's backpack, whilst his coloured accomplice distracted him, that the whole world saw - to England's shame.

Will they now jail David Starkey, the outspoken homosexual historian, for daring to touch on some uncomfortable home truths? No doubt the "usual suspects" will call for him to get a longer sentence than the gangsta looters!

What was it Orwell said about the truth being revolutionary? Did we ever live in such Orwellian times?

Meanwhile the Neo Con mouthpiece David Aaronovitch boasts of the need for more CCTV, because these people do not want the gangsta menace wiped out -- they want to molly coddle them, and use their endemic criminality to get more Police State powers (whilst they live in the safety of their rich enclaves).

Aaronovitch also says the gangstas are no different from the Mods and Rockers on the beach at Brighton, or Skins and Punks in the late 70s.

I think those of us who saw homes and businesses burnt down see a vast difference! These Neo Cons and liberals also know that all the white youth groups (mods, rockers, skinheads, whatever) were never pumping areas full of guns and drugs.

The Neo Con right and the liberal/Marxist left are deliberately putting up a smoke screen. They will paint it as non-racial, when we know where and how it started. They will paint it as poverty when those people wear trainers and carry phones more expensive than anything I have.


The gangstas have made the streets of London unsafe for decades. The police know this. They know who are carrying the knives and the guns. But to talk about the elephant in the room - as David Starkey has - is to face the screaming hordes.

The reverse of this media whitewash (excuse the pun!) is that Sikhs and Muslims who defended their homes and businesses (as is their right) in Southall and Dalston, whilst tooled up with knives and swords, are proclaimed as heroes by the media, politicians etc.

Yet the White English who took to their streets in Enfield and Eltham are dismissed and attacked as "right wing extremists" even though they carried no weapons to defend their own communities.

This is how the media works. Lap it up.

11 comments:

Anonymous said...

FC

Don't know if you recall, but quite a while back I suggested you contact Starkey.

I'm sure with him being an arse-bandit getting all the publicity (and filthy lucre!) he's putting that fat faggot Websters nose out of joint, which is a bonus

Final Conflict said...

I'm sure Starkey would find some of our beliefs (esp on homosexuality) as detrimental to his outlook as we would find some of his.

Having said that, on many subjects he does make sense, as indeed does Webster.

It is the homosexuality of many of such people that makes them 'lose the plot' and try to promote a cause and deathstyle that the enemies of civilisation want promoted.

Shame.

Anonymous said...

Starkey said 'Enoch Powell was Right' which seemed pretty forthright. No wonder the Liberal-Left are attacking him! Powell actually invited black nurses to England when he was Health Minister in 1960, but realised his mistake and spoke out against coloured immigration in 1968.
Sir Oswald Mosley opposed coloured immigration from the very start way back in 1952, and opposed Jewish immigration in the 1930s. How right he was and how stupid of us not to have listened to him!

Anonymous said...

Let's see if Rod Liddle gets his turn on next week's Newsnight, he's a Millwall fan by the way!

S B said...

Anonymous said...

Starkey said 'Enoch Powell was Right' which seemed pretty forthright.
----------------------------------

I think you are being somewhat economical with the truth there ..perhaps you should listen again to what he actually said about Enoch Powell..

Anonymous said...

Yeah, he 'corrected' Enoch regarding the 'foaming Tiber'!

Final Conflict said...

Yes he said it wasnt blood - it was flames. Big difference. Thanks SB, your words must bring great comfort to those burnt out.

Keep up the good work defending the indefesible!

Anonymous said...

I am over in the US. I agree with many of your positions, but am afraid I think you are missing the boat on israel and the muslims.

in looking in your store, I see lots of nazi oriented stuff, thus apprently the animosity towards the jews. i cant sway you there, that is ingrained.

but to underestimate the muslims, thats your mistake. you ally with them and they will eat you alive in the end. cant you see the problems europe already faces?

Final Conflict said...

We are not "allied" with Muslims, we are pro-Christian and oppose all coloured immigration.

We just do not see the need to engage in meaningless, needless, illegal and expensive foreign wars for Israel.

On the other hand those who say Muslims are to blame for everything are liars: they did not bring down Lehmans, they did not riot in London, we also believe that 911 was a 'false flag' op - and there is plenty of evidence of Mossad being in NY and celebrating on 11th Sept 2001.

Israel is not our ally. It has killed our soldiers, breaks UN resolutions, uses terror tactics.

So why would we support a terrorist state?

Anonymous said...

Nationalists will not fight against the muslim on behalf of the insidiuous jew.

Anonymous said...

I couldn't stop laughing as that young white chap (Jones?) said Starkie was "Offensive". Mention "Race" in a normal conversation with members of that generation (if you can get them to pull the wires out of their ears!) and watch what happens - their throats seem to sieze up, they appear to choke, words like "Offensive", "racist" automatically appear. Women are the worst (or should that be the best - in entertainment value) and usual say "I don't want to talk about that..anymore". Hilarious!


MusicPlaylistView Profile
Create a playlist at MixPod.com