Sunday, 27 July 2008

Last Week's Quote: Justin Barrett on Taxation & National Debt

"The idea that excessive income tax is the result of the social welfare bill is so common that useful connections between classes for national purposes is now very near impossible. Never mind that over 70% of the income tax collected goes to pay just the interest on the National Debt to international bankers, who are, of course, very respectable people not at all like the "wasters on the dole"."

Justin Barrett,
The National Way Forward.

5 comments:

behind blue eyes said...

My own personal opinion is that every Nationalist needs to know about and understand the mechanics of the monetary /banking system and those who control and manipulate it. It really is the key subject.

There is a definite correlation between increased government spending and borrowing and rises in income tax and other stealth taxes. A direct result of government borrowing is the increase in our National Debt which is nigh on impossible to ever pay off.

Here is some information on banking taken from the excellent article entitled - THE LONGEST HATRED ~ An Examination of Anti-Gentilism. Every Nationalist should read this. A copy can be found at:-
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/hatred.htm

'A Bank makes an entry in one of its own ledgers (nowadays a computer file). This act brings a sum of ‘money’ into ‘existence’. That sum of ‘money’ is then loaned to a customer—generally by means of a ‘credit’ to his account, which he ‘spends’ by issuing cheques. The loan, however, must be secured by a collateral of real value such as a house, and must be repaid—‘capital’ and interest—in real money, that is, money that has had to be worked for and is therefore a token of real wealth. Thereafter, by another stroke of the pen (or tap of the computer keys) the ‘capital’ sum originally created can be made to disappear out of existence. It really is a magic trick!

"In 1694 JEWS created the Bank of England."—The Jews and Modern Capitalism. The Bank of England is not English in origin and was not founded as a Government institution but a privately run Bank. The Government of the day surrendered its sovereign prerogative over the issue and control of the nation’s money into the hands of a private group of financiers. From this date to the present, successive British Governments have borrowed money from the Bankers to run the nation’s business and fights its wars—money which the Bankers create out of nothing.All unpaid ‘loans’ plus accumulated interest forms the National Debt. Income tax and all other taxes are not paid simply to meet all the current and anticipated expenses of Government—these are mainly paid for out of new loans—but in large part to service the National Debt which has been built up over centuries. Thus the whole country and its people are in pawn to the Banks and all the real power resides, therefore, not in Parliament but with the mega-Bankers who issue the nation’s money and control its value and distribution. The ‘nationalisation’ of the Bank of England in 1946 provided an opportunity to reverse this situation. But it was not taken, so the charade continues, although by slightly different means. For centuries the British people have toiled, laboured, starved and begged; not because of any shortage of food, goods and services, but because the Banks have withheld the means of exchange. They have created poverty in the midst of plenty. The Government offers Treasury Notes (the nation’s IOUs) to the Banks in return for money to carry on the nation’s business. Thus the national estate has been systematically pawned to the banks, and the people have been progressively sold into debt-and-tax bondage.

ON 22nd DECEMBER 1964 Captain Henry Kirby, M. P., called upon the House of Commons to support the Motion that:
"The continued issue of all the means of exchange—be they coin, bank notes or credit largely passed on by cheque—by private firms as an interest-bearing debt against the public should cease forthwith; that the Sovereign power and duty of issuing money should be returned to the Crown, then be put into circulation free of all debt and interest obligations, as a public service, not as a private opportunity for profit and control for no tangible returns to the British people... so as to assure the State and Nation the benefits of that emission and relieve them of the immense and growing burdens of a parasitical National and private debt; and to make certain that control passes to the taxed and is taken out of the hands of the present hidden unlawful beneficiaries of taxation ... this House calls upon Her Majesty’s Government to introduce the required legislation... to assure unprecedented prosperity with true sovereignty and liberty."

If our cowardly and contemptible bunch of politicians had supported Captain Kirby we would now have interest-free mortgages and virtually no taxation. We could have become the most prosperous nation on earth. But the Members of Parliament we vote for look after their own interests and faithfully serve the satanic Bankers who are wrecking and ruining Britain.'

Final Conflict said...

You are right.

Christ said Money is the Root of all Evil.

That being so, the banksters are Satan's emisaries on earth!

behind blue eyes said...

I wonder if this Red Indian quote was referring to the Satanic Mammon worshipping bankers:-

"After all of the trees have been cut down,
After all of the fish have been eaten,
After all of the rivers have been poisoned,
Only then will you realize,
Money can't be eaten."


Mind you, in 2005 a Canadian Chief - who was a Korean veteran - caused an uproar when he basically labelled Jews as draft dodgers and instigators of the World Wars.

Simon Smith said...

I've asked the Bank of England by emailing them who owns the stock/shares in it. They haven't been forthcoming. This is a very difficult area of research. There's a separate entity that "guards" the list of shareholders.

Obviously we believe it's the Queen, Rothchilds and the usual suspects etc

American researchers have done well getting to the bottom of the Federal Reserve. To the best of my knowledge, there hasn't been the same eye of scrutiny directed at the Bank Of England .(Correct me if I'm wrong)

As Blue Eyes has said, this subject is crucial and is the real behind the scenes story of our history since 1694 and perhaps a little earlier.

I hope younger people who read the political blogs with some talent might consider giving the Bank Of England the same treatment that Eustace Mullins and G Edward Griffin did to the Federal Reserve. There is a big gap in our knowledge I believe.

behind blue eyes said...

Just come across this information from another site.

WHO OWNS THE STOCK? A recent article in the London Financial Times indicates why it is impossible to gain an accurate estimate of the wealth of the trillionaire banking elite. Discussing the sale of Evelyn Rothschild''s stake in Rothschild Continuation Holdings, it states:..[this] requires agreement on the valuation of privately held assets whose value has never been tested in a public market. Most of these assets are held in a complex network of tax-efficient structures around the world. Queen Elizabeth II's shareholdings remain hidden behind Bank of England Nominee accounts. The Guardian newspaper reported in May 2002... the reason for the wild variations in valuations of her private wealth can be pinned on the secrecy over her portfolio of share investments. This is because her subjects have no way of knowing through a public register of interests where she, as their head of state, chooses to invest her money. Unlike the members of the Commons and now the Lords, the Queen does not have to annually declare her interests and as a result her subjects cannot question her or know about potential conflicts of interests...

In fact, the Queen even has an extra mechanism to ensure that her investments remain secret - a nominee company called the Bank of England Nominees. It has been available for decades to all the world's current heads of state to allow them anonymity when buying shares. Therefore, when a company publishes a share register and the Bank of England Nominees is listed, it is not possible to gauge whether the Queen, President Bush or even Saddam Hussein is the true shareholder.By this method, the trillionaire masters of the universe remain hidden whilst Forbes magazine poses lower ranking billionaires like Bill Gates and Warren Buffett as the richest men in the world. Retired management consultant Gaylon Ross Sr, author of Who's Who of the Global Elite, has been tipped from a private source that the combined wealth of the Rockefeller family in 1998 was approximately (U.S.) $11 trillion and the Rothschilds (U.S.) $100 trillion


MusicPlaylistView Profile
Create a playlist at MixPod.com