Bravo to Simon Darby.
Yes I'll say it again, bravo to Simon Darby.
Right: If this lady were born in China would she be Chinese?
On the Jeremy Vine Show on BBC Radio 2 today, in the shadow of the BNP's decision to cave into the equality refuseniks and let in black members, he was asked directly does he feel more in common with Polish Whites than "Black Britons" (sic) to which he replied (after a pregnant pause) yes.
FC has been saying this for years whilst many BNPers have been making silly noises about Black Britons (sic) such as Africans, Asians et al who were 'born here' or who 'pay taxes here' being good patriotic Brits (especially if they race mix -- remember the Black Zimbabwean in Cumbria in the BNP's paper?); we have more in common with our fellow White Europeans than we ever will with the 57 Variety of coloured immigrants, their descendants and dependents.
Now it seems the BNP's No. 2 is on our side!
It's RACE NOT SPACE.
Credit where it is due.
Mr. Darby says he doesn't want soft Tories taking over the BNP. Amen to that.
Neither should any decent nationalist want race-mixers and degenerates "taking over" the BNP.
Today may have been a brief blip. An aberration in an otherwise liberalising trend.
But, even if momentarily amongst the pro-Israeli drivel, what a breath of fresh air.
Friday, 16 October 2009
BNP: Polish Whites - YES! Black "Britons" - NO!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
those disgusted with griffins attempt to broaden the party membership base, in the hope that jewish money will find its way into his coffers, should now use this moment to break away, to form a new movement that is based on principle not compromise. then perhaps those of us who are nationalist but dont want to be associated with fake griffin-nationalism might come back into the fold.
Jeremy Vine, I pity him, he has to bow down to the Owners of Britain, I do rather, think that Jeremy is not a bad chap, just not ready or able to take the stand needed. He did say how Christians are up against it in England so...
The BNP reminds one more and more of the Tories, still they have failed to understand that the embracing of the ENEMY whilst attacking the enemy's enemy is foolishness.
I do not want people of colour in Britian or America or Australia or New Zealand or RSA for that matter, the religious aspects are besides the point. America is being invaded primarily by CHRISTIANS, not genuine Christians of course but non-Whites who were, in the long ago past, filled with ideas of Christianity which is not really a religion for THOSE types.
Just one man's opinion.
For the weight of the fake government is about to press down on the BNP so how they can avoid self-destruction by GOVERNMENT ORDER is something we shall wait and see. There is no way to compromise with evil.
For ye, brethren, became followers of the churches of God which in Judea are in Christ Jesus: for ye also have suffered like things of your own countrymen, even as they have of the Jews: Who both killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they please not God, and are contrary to all men.
I Thessalonians 2:14-15
What's with all this fuss about BNP 'caving-in', all that needs to be done is to take away the membership criteria (ie. specify the racial description), everyone knows the BNP is for Whites (and the odd yid!) so why would a mud want to join - and even if they wanted to there is no need to take them in or just take their money and f**k them off.
The Western world (ie. White) is subservient to the legal professions, so you either 'play the game' or you don't.
The BNP have not agreed to let blacks into the party, you are lieing.
The decision will be debated and voted on at a EGM.Please get your facts right.
FAO: Anonymous
Go on then big mouth...lead the way
1. Anonymous attacking anonymous. physician heal thyself!
2. Er the BNP have agreed to let blacks in - because Griffin is spinning it and all their main bods are already toeing the party line.
Their EGM/AGM votes are rigged and spun to get their way.
The BNP will vote to accept it as that's what NG has wanted for many years.
It now appears the BNP is sending out directly contradictory messages.
NG made a statement on the official BNP site that they have outwitted the EHRC.
meanwhile a mail-out bearing NG's signature says they were FORCED into allowing blacks in.
So which is the truth?
Furthermore it appears that the BNP raised a lot of money with 4 appeals to bring in money to fight the case, and on various forums [fora?] some appear ill at ease with this raising funds under false pretences.
Post a Comment