Anyone want to respond to Nick Griffin on Question Time?
Best Bit:
When he attacked the needless [Zionist] War in Iraq. he took a solidly nationalist (and anti-Zionist!) line and actually sounded sincere and full of righteous anger. He stated that Jack Straw had the blood of 800,000 Muslims on his hands...
Worst Bit:
When he stated that the BNP was the only party that stood full square behind Israel in the recent 'Gaza conflict.' He sounded like a Zionist pimp and what's more it contradicted the stance on the Iraq war which dripped with natural justice, dripping rather with insincere Zionist extremism.
No doubt others will have their favourite bits!
Friday, 23 October 2009
Nick Griffin on Question Time: The Good & The Bad (and the Ugly - Jack Straw).
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
he came across as an insincere, fatuous politician, mumbling through and dodging questions.
He could have taken the lead, set the agenda, discussed social injustice, the banking swindle and much else besides.
Instead of pretending to be Mr. Moderate, he should have turned the tables on those who have sold our future to the banks.
His support of Israel was disgraceful.
Shekels ahoy.
his body language was poor. His preparation was poor. His advisors' advice was poor. His arguments were mostly poor.
Shame.
He equated homosexuality with heterosexuality.
He said he would ban any homosexual "education" in primary schools (secondary schools fine then!) but then added the rider that he would ban all sex-ed in primary schools.
So his schools policy is that heterosexual sex and homosexual sex won't be discussed in primary schools.
At least the Tories had the balls to ban promotion of homosexuality in ALL schools.
Another wet weekend policy from Griffin.
Not a good day at the office for NG in the view of most nationalists but it has once again raised the profile of the nationalist movement , time for action not just words .
yeah. if you think our "profile" should be backing ISRAEL.
The public know what he meant.
the comment about native britions 17,000 years ago showed a lack of focus and allowed the black professoress to make griffin look foolish. did griffin mean 1700 years and not 17000? big difference.
still for a man who many believe is working as a plant, with the destructive aim of providing a mainstream honeytrap for comfort-zone nationalists, then a little subterfuge can go a long way.
once griffin has been exposed we true nationalists will return to the fold. until then we must sit back and wait for the bnp to collapse under the weight of unrelenting ompromise.
Post a Comment