It appears that the two Scottish paedophile ring-leaders, including the head of a "Gay Youth" group who campaigned against Section 28, have received minimum sentences which means they will serve longer than the typical 7.5 years.
Right: The eight convicted members of the paedophile network are (top, left to right) Colin Slaven, Craig Boath, James Rennie, John Milligan, (bottom, left to right) John Murphy, Neil Strachan, Ross Webber and Neil Campbell. (Two with minimum sentences in bold).
I guess that's better than nothing.
But when they were raping children as young as 3 months old, we have to ask when these absolute scum (oft over-used, but absolutely apt here) have to do something disturbing enough to face the death penalty.
Neil Strachan, 41, attempted to rape an 18-month-old boy while 38-year-old James Rennie sexually assaulted a three-month-old.
Strachan was sentenced to a minimum of 16 years in prison, while Rennie was ordered to serve at least 13 years.
I know it sounds like a cliché and it's a populist slogan etc. etc., but there surely comes a time when the crime committed is so obscene and Satanic, that the death penalty is the only response from a society which seeks to retain an iota of decency.
According to reports "Rennie was the chief executive of LGBT Youth Scotland, which offers advice to young gay and lesbian people."
'Young people' is pc code for children, some highly disturbed, confused, hormonal and looking for help... only to have an illness, deathstyle and perversion pushed on them as not just acceptable but a preferred "choice."
He also appeared on Scottish TV in the late 90s arguing against Section 28 - the law which prevented scum like him and his degenerate group going into Scottish schools and promoting homosexuality to young children.
He was also welcomed into the Scottish parliament by Labour ministers of the then Scottish government.
He also got to meet the Queen in his role as faggots' rights campaigner.
Would the perverts and Scottish (sic) politicians who agitated for the repeal of Section 28 for all their own warped politically correct and deranged sexual proclivities now have the decency to allow it to be re-introduced?
For the partial protection of schoolchildren and the (perhaps vain) effort to let children retain some sort of innocence for as long as possible.
The next Faggots Rights campaigner going into YOUR children's school could be a paedo.
Many homosexuals believe the age of consent should be lower than 16, with militant campaigners agitating, in their own sordid circles and literature, for it to be as low as 9!
THIS SHOULD BE A WARNING FOR ALL PARENTS.
Link:
1 comments:
what is a natural sexual impulse? one can quite understand the man who gains sexual gratification from looking at footage of attractive women.
however when a mans graification is obtained by watching acts of violence, or bodily excretion or involve children and animals, then can this even be called a sexual act? it becomes somethng entirely different.
the zionist media likes to label all manner of obscene acts as being sexually motvated, when in fact these acts are nothing whatsoever to do with sex or natural impulses.
Post a Comment