Change We Can Believe In? Obama's Betrayed Turn to Ron Paul

After being betrayed by (more war, more banks, more Israel, more welfare) Obama, how many "radicals" searching for answers as the banking crisis forces billions into welfare dependency, will come across the anti-usury, anti-fractional reserve banking message of patriots?

The media hate Ron Paul in reality because he is anti-interventionist in the Middle east and far from being a rabid Zionist (a must-do stance for all US Presidents), but again, to the young, idealistic voters and activists this can only be a good thing, and even most "right wing" republicans know, in their hearts, that America needs to be far more isolationist after the disasters of Iraq and Afghanistan.

of course because he is not a Zionist and has real answers to the banking crisis, the media and the parties will paint Ron Paul as "dangerous" but in the internet age, enquiring youngsters will only be spurred on to read for themselves what he has to say on the banks and Israel, and then wonder why this is so "dangerous" after all.

No one is suggesting Ron Paul has all the answers, but he is several steps down the right road.

What a shame that "patriots" in the UK are so consumed by "muzzies" that the perfect storm of the banking crisis has found them in a position unwilling or unable to 'capitalise' on the crisis - a sin of commission or omission?

Young people in 'the West' are looking for answers. They won't find it in a movement which, from the outside looks like a reactionary right-wing defender of the State (and status quo) and a drum-beater for Israel.

Change We Can Believe In? Maybe in America... not yet in Britain.

Link:
Young Flock to Ron Paul's Message