A gay couple, Mike and Dave. Well, they look happy
How quick we have moved, or rather have been pushed, as a society.
It doesn't take long does it for the usual degenerate anti-Christian, anti-family agenda to come to the fore.
Now a Tory MP, Mike Weatherley MP for Hove, wants Churches that refuse to do "gay weddings" (whatever the HELL they are!) to face a crackdown from the State.
Dear God in heaven! Just 15 years ago you would have thought such a thing would be the plot from a book about the advent of the Anti-Christ.
Will "Call me Dave" Cameron brush this aside to look like a "pretty straight kinda guy" [copyright T. Blair] whilst he pushes through yet more pro-homosexual laws? Seems likely. So Cameron looks like he's pro-family and decent, whilst a Brighton area MP picks up more pooftah votes.
Kerching.
As sections of the BBC push "BCE/CE" instead of BC/AD for years as a way to undermine our Christian culture (stupid really as BCE and CE - [Before] Common Era, both take their cut-off point as the birth of Christ) we shouldn't be that surprised.
The BBC hope that be enforcing BCE and CE in more places it will become more widely used, like the accursed "partner" has replaced spouse/husband/wife/fiancee/girlfriend/boyfriend/casual sexual partner/menage a trois/tree with a weird shaped hole in it.
Our culture is being eroded, by the BBC, by mass immigration and by the laws pushed by Rotshchild-rent-boy politicians.
Traitors.
If this MP ever got his way we would be like the Scots in Braveheart being married in the woods, or the Irish in Elizabethan penal times, attending Mass in the wilderness. Given the choice between the "official" State-sanctioned Church (as in the USSR or today's China) or the underground Church that remains loyal to Church teachings, we would have no choice!
I was listening to a "best of Today" podcast, from Radio 4's famous morning news programme. It was on Greece, the Euro and the economy (from last Friday I think).
Lo and behold up popped an "expert" from Goldman Sachs. Now I do not know all the intricacies of the 'Global Downturn' but my failing memory tells me that Goldman Sachs played quite the pivotal role.
So there I was, shaking my fist at my MP3 player, when the interviewer, John Humphries cut in that Goldman Sachs had helped created the mess with Greece by hiding the extent of Greece's debts. He intimated that in lying (fraud surely?) Goldman Sachs had made a bad situation worse, letting monies being poured into a Greek black hole.
The response of the Goldman Sachs man? "I have not come on here to discuss that."
I bet he hadn't! He would rather pretend to be an "expert" on economics, positing his theories for saving us all from catastrophe, whereas in reality he and his other colleagues had helped create the banking crisis and the Euro crisis.
"We are machines built by DNA whose purpose is to make more copies
of the same DNA…It is every living object's sole reason for living." -
Richard Dawkins
"It is as if a man were asked, "What is the use
of a hammer?" and answered, "To make hammers"; and when asked, "And of
those hammers, what is the use?" answered, "To make hammers again". Just
as such a man would be perpetually putting off the question of the
ultimate use of carpentry, so...all the rest of us are by these phrases
successfully putting off the question of the ultimate value of the human
life." - G. K. Chesterton
In
order to have purpose, something must have been created with an
intended purpose, thus requiring a creator; therefore, in order for the
universe (and the life that exists within it) to have purpose, it must
have been created with an intended purpose, thus requiring a creator
(otherwise known as God). If God does not exist, then nothing created
the universe, and therefore the universe and everything within it exists
without purpose.
Most atheists try to avoid this dilemma by
explaining that, even though God does not exist to give the universe
purpose, we can still give the universe (and our lives) purpose. True,
but then what is the point? If the universe ultimately has no purpose,
then what is the point of giving it purpose other than to hide the fact
that it has no purpose?
Still others try to be more creative. For
example, biologist Richard Dawkins explains that the purpose of life is
to pass our genes to the next generation. While his atheistic clergy
might find this explanation satisfactory, to the rest of us, it’s rather
shallow, as it implies that the purpose of life is to create more life
(and the purpose of that life is to create more life, and so on and so
forth until the end of time). He might as well say that we exist for the
sake of existing, which is less an explanation and more an excuse.
Then again, if you’re an atheist, what else do you have but excuses?
Tradition is the extension of Democracy through time; it is the proxy of the dead and the enfranchisement of the unborn.
Tradition
may be defined as the extension of the franchise. Tradition means
giving votes to the most obscure of all classes, our ancestors. It is
the democracy of the dead. Tradition refuses to submit to the small and
arrogant oligarchy of those who merely happen to be walking about. All
democrats object to men being disqualified by the accident of birth;
tradition objects to their being disqualified by the accident of death.
Democracy tells us not to neglect a good man's opinion, even if he is
our groom; tradition asks us not to neglect a good man's opinion, even
if he is our father. I, at any rate, cannot separate the two ideas of
democracy and tradition.
If there's one thing about atheists it's that they like to blame everything on God - who doesn't exist. Eh? So next they blame those of us taken in by the "god delusion."
We are thick, stupid and ignorant. They are all-wise, forward-thinking and intelligent. We believe in "myths" while they believe in (unproven) "facts" like the Big Bang and Evolution. They weren't there at the "Big Bang" nor have they found the 'missing link' -- it's a leap of faith you see.
They say that religion causes war, whereas atheism will bring peace to all mankind. The Brotherhood of Man. As well as being a cheesy 70s pop quartet that is a Masonic ideal. Like "equality." It sounds all fine and dandy, until you realise what it, and the manifestation of it in the real world, entails.
Atheism has always been the football of the Freemasons. They have sought to destroy Christianity via the promotion of atheism. That's why the French Revolution was followed inevitably by the Terror, the period when umpteen thousands lost their lives because they did not want to be part of the new atheist state, because they would not give up their Faith, they became 'enemies of the State,' as people who live under atheist regimes quickly find out to their cost, if you don't toe the line, they come down on you like a ton of bricks.
You see atheists like to put it about that they are "live and let live" kind of people. Some may think they are! Yet they and their ideal is essentially a negation of Christianity. They may warble on about Animists in Africa, and giggle at Aboriginal tales of creation, but these fireside stories of pagan peoples are brought in to the mix to belittle Christianity - their Public Enemy Number One.
Atheism was born in Europe and is nurtured by European Freemasonry. They were behind the French Revolution. They supported the Bolshevik Revolution (as did the Wall Street Banks run by mega-rich atheists, Masons and anti-Christians). They will always support any movement that seeks to overthrow Christianity, because Christianity is the number one enemy.
On Twitter recently I have been arguing with a band of atheists (I know, pearls before swine), and have said to them that the officially atheist USSR murdered millions of Ukrainian Christians. This is atheism. They will not have it. They argue it's political. They argue not all atheists are Communists.
But they are twisting (or spinning) the facts. An officially atheist state murdered millions of Christians, as policy. Just as they shut down churches. Just as they put Christians in the gulags.
The facts speak for themselves. As does the anti-Christian hatred of the atheists across Europe (all backed by Masonic ideals) whether in Spain, Hungary, France... these atheists forces were spurred on by a hatred of Christianity. Remember the dead bodies of nuns exhumed on the steps of the local church and opened to rot in the sun? That was done by the "democrats" - the Republicans - in the Spanish Civil War. Were the nuns "fascists"? No, they were dead women. The Republicans, democrats or whatever the hell they were did that because they were atheists and hated Christianity!
Can you imagine a Christian army that would dig up dead atheist nobodies, and dump the bodies in the street outside some atheist building, just to make a point? Out of pure hatred? No, neither can I.
Now the atheists always point at religion as being responsible for wars. They ignore that most wars in history were over land, wealth, ascendancy etc. and often between cousins, related peoples etc. Think of the wars between England and France (at the time both Catholic nations) primarily because England was ruled by a Francophone monarchy with a claim (rightful or dubious depending whether you were English or French) to the French crown and lands. It was essentially a family squabble, you might compare it to the War of the Roses.
Yet many atheists will sit and say that the wars like these were caused by religion. How absurd.
The only wars caused directly by religion were those of the Crusades and those following the Reformation, and in those limited cases we should remember that (as with irreligious or 'normal' wars) there are things known as "just wars" and those known as "unjust wars."
One thing is perfectly clear though, in the whole history of the wars "caused by religion" (as opposed to territorial or national wars) these pale in significance to the 100 million people killed by Communism in the 20th Century alone.
Dare I remind you that Communism is/was an atheist creed? Some would argue its very raison d'etre is to wipe out Christianity, so that the poor sods left living worship the State and only the State.
If we had a State in the 20th century that was officially theist, and its policy was the spread of Christianity (hint: there are none now, France long has been Masonic, the UK too, as was the USA from its inception), that murdered dozens of millions of atheists in its policy to impose Christianity on the world, then the atheist apologists on Twitter and elsewhere would be screaming from the very rooftops!
Yet we had a State that was officially atheist. It was called the USSR. It murdered many dozens of millions of innocent men, women and children because they were Christians. They were killed because Christians were a threat to their Brave New World, their atheist state, which would export its atheist materialism across the world.
The atheists who like to bang on about the Franco-Anglo wars between inter-related Royalty in which mostly professional soldiers and army conscripts died as internecine squabbles over land and power rumbled back and forth for years, get all defensive when the deliberate murder of millions of Christians is brought up.
They twist, they turn, the squeal, they screech. Oh the usual words such as "bigot" are thrown around willy-nilly and even "conspiracy" as they deny history and the death of millions at the hand of a state machinery (which should be illegal shouldn't it? - it is in Germany!).
You see one of the few officially atheist states in the world carried out the worst and biggestmass murder of men, women and children ever in the entire history of the world.
They can squeal and they can squirm, but no twisting the facts, no denying this holocaust, no misrepresentation, no calumnies against the innocent victims, can undo the horrific crime perpetrated by the officially atheist USSR against Christian victims.
Once again, I ask you: imagine if an officially Christian country (there are none today outside the Vatican City statelet, hardly a serious nation-state) purposefully wiped out millions of atheists as a matter of state policy to get rid of atheists or break their resolve as a thorn-in-the-side of the Christian state. Do you think those same atheists would say "oh no it wasn't a really Christian state" or "it's more complicated than that really?" -- These are people who say countless political/national/territorial/fratricidal conflicts were the fault of Christianity with little or no evidence.
Atheists killed 100 million people in the 20th Century. We can blame the Masons, the Communists, whatever. The fact remains:
ATHEISM KILLED 100 MILLION PEOPLE IN THE 20TH CENTURY.
So Mr. Beardie in your Hush Puppies, Mr. DJ Funk-master with your line of coke, Mr. City Banker with your house in the Cotswolds or Mr Anarcho-lefty with your black flag and allowance from mummy: accept the cold, hard fact that whatever else you may promise, the Brotherhood of Man quickly gives way to the State of the Gulag.
As GK Chesterton once said, the problem with atheism is not that when men stop believing in God they believe in nothing, rather that they will believe in anything. Even the worn out lies, hatred, spin, and fury of the atheists themselves, who will always push for what is not wanted or needed (gay marriage, legalisation of hard drugs, restriction of border controls, widespread abortion, break-up of the family and so on, etc. etc. etc.) simply because it helps bring about the end of the last vestige of Christianity in our society, cannot disguise these simple facts.
Man always needs a belief system and a moral code. Nature abhors a vacuum (especially when the football's on - sorry, dad joke). So without Christianity we have to have, one way or another, a replacement - that's when we end up with State Socialism, Bankers' greed, homo-rights, mass abortion, rampant usury, criminals' rights etc. etc. etc.
The atheists will promise peace but deliver war. They will promise happiness but deliver fear. They will promise love but deliver hatred. They will promise plenty but deliver want. They will promise freedom but deliver the gulag.
Remember. Atheism killed 100 million in the last century.
Given half a chance they would gladly do the same all over again. Their barely concealed hatred for those who "dare" to defend Christianity and Christian Truth is there for all to see. In 1917 the powerful Wall Street banks bank-rolled the Communist Revolution, because the same anti-God forces were at work in Wall Street. Today the children of 1968 run the EU. "Ex" Communists infest it from top to bottom, as can be seen from the laws their undemocratic executive pass against the family, against decency, for the atheist State etc. etc.
The names, places and means have changed. But the idea, the aim remains the same.
It started when they rounded up the "fascists." I did not speak out because I wasn't a fascist.
Then they rounded up the "pro-lifers." I did not speak out because I wasn't a pro-lifer.
Then they rounded up those opposed to gay "marriage." I did not speak out because I wasn't opposed to gay "marriage."
Then they rounded up those opposed to immigration. I did not speak out because I wasn't opposed to immigration.
Then they rounded up the Anti-EU lobby. I did not speak out because I wasn't in the anti-EU lobby.
Then they rounded up the Christians. I did not speak out because I wasn't a Christian.
Then they came for me...
In recent months the BNP leader has attacked the English Defence League as a Zionist front-group.
To be fair, the EDL is pro-Zionist. Yet so is the BNP as these choice quotes make clear:
Don't forget Griffin used his biggest nationwide media opportunity on the BBC's Question Time to promote the BNP as the one party that had given Israel unequivocal support in its assault on Gaza, Operation Cast Lead: "There are Nazis in Britain and they loathe me because I have brought
the BNP from being frankly an anti-Semitic and racist organisation into
being the only political party which in the clashes between Israel and
Gaza stood full-square behind Israel’s right to deal with Hamas
terrorists."
Lee Barnes (in his days as a BNP legal representative and columnist) wrote on the BNP website: "As a Nationalist I can say that I support Israel 100 % in their dispute
with Hezbollah. In fact, I hope they wipe Hezbollah off the Lebanese
map and bomb them until they leave large greasy craters in the cities
where their Islamic extremist cantons of terror once stood."
-- as posted by "retread" on the British Democracy Forum.
Ipso facto, the BNP calling the EDL Zionist is more than a little silly. Is the BNP trying to reassure its grass roots (door closed, horse bolted) or merely trying to undermine the credibility of the EDL?
This makes for an interesting video.
The bloke is quite amusing, but twists the facts somewhat.
He knows that the media and the establishment can twist facts. Otherwise why would most Sun readers/Eastenders watchers think that our intervention in Libya was about saving lives and helping a group of people after "democracy."
He also knows that the media can "cover" a story, the equivalent of putting it on page 23, or publicise it by giving it prominence. Ipso facto how many people think that the (pro-Zionist) EDL's boss was in jail?
He is also being more than economical with the facts if he thinks an arrest for assault and then a ban from attending political rallies is not political. As ex-West London NF leader Phil Andrews found out to his cost in the 80s, one can be arrested for violence on little or no evidence. As for banning someone from specific political rallies - that is in reality being a political prisoner.
Don't even begin on the Zionist control of the media. That has been well documented and has nothing to do with the presenters and journalists. The American media especially is almost entirely Zionist owned. Only a fool would say otherwise. Various Jewish individuals have written about this, because they are proud of it (not to have a pop) therefore these facts are not the figment of anyone's imagination, not least people like the EDL boss who is very pro-Israel.
This chap also ignores the minutiae of the British media, in which multi-culti liberalism plays a huge part. So whilst the "Zionists" will appreciate a street movement that pushes the patriotic types toward Israeli policy (a road first trod by Mr Griffin), the liberal media will not want to promote the EDL boss's loss of liberty, just for addressing a political rally (even if it was a pro-Israeli one and he was dressed as a rabbi).
When dealing with the secret state, the media and suchlike, one is not dealing (if you'll excuse the pun) in black and white. This chap knows that of course, unless he is a complete arse. Think of Northern Ireland where the state has assets in Loyalist and Republican groups, even if some might simplify that situation to say the Loyalists were pro-British State and the Republicans were anti-British State. This would not stop the State from having assets in both, saying different things, pushing in various directions. Some may be promoted by the media, some ignored, depending on the ideology of the reporters, depending on the State policy at that time, and 101 other permutations.
So enjoy the video. The bloke is amusing. But don't be fooled. The BNP is likely to fold. It has certainly already collapsed. Another safety valve will come to the fore. It may be the EDL, it may be some other grouping.
The main picture to keep in mind is that the world financial system is usurious and run by the Rothschilds and their lieutenants. The political system is Masonic and the left/right dichotomy is in the pockets of the bankers. The mass media is controlled and will never defend the interests of the people.
Whatever simple idiots like this might say, we are just sheep paying taxes and having our rights taken away and our birth-right ripped from us. Democracy is a sham under the control of international financiers - the New Unhappy Lords that GK Chesterton warned us about and AK Chesterton wrote in-depth about.
In the years in between things have worsened.
Mass immigration, homosexual "rights," out of control abortion, war after unjustified Zionist war, drugs rampant, usury that has put billions out of work, taxation that is rapacious (mostly to pay uncontrollable usury-debt), an EU into which money is poured as in into a bottomless pit, and many other evils in which none of us had a say.
Democracy is a joke. Were our fathers asked in the 40s if millions of non-Whites should be allowed in? And on all the other issues above, we've been lied to, facts have have been twisted, and the controlled mass media has been used to con us all.
"Anti-racists" are like the peaceniks of the 60s. They are today's "useful idiots." But instead of being the 'useful idiots' of the USSR with its gulags full of Christian Russians, Ukrainians etc., they are the 'useful idiots' of those who wish to enslave the world because they are set out to destroy all nationality, all national pride that allows peoples to stand as-one in defiance of destruction and slavery (whether the native Indians of the Americas or the white Christian communities of Europe).
Once we lose our nationalism, our sense of patriotism, our belief that we are rooted in the land (blood and soil) that our forefathers worked, defended and lived on, then we lose the will to defend that land from the New Unhappy Lords: the EU Commissioners, the Rothschilds, the media moguls and all who seek to turn us into coffee coloured, brain-dead, tax-slaves too busy singing 'One World' anthems to see that we are mice in the laboratory of the mega-rich banksters who own the world through the creation of usury-debt.
Remember your traditions. Hold fast to the Faith of your fathers. Stand firm on the soil on which they toiled and bled. Defend the family with all your might.
We all have a duty to fight. We can fight in our daily lives. Fight in the way we bring up our children. Fight in the way we spread our ideas and educate others.
To not fight is to accept slavery and join the unthinking drones who do not see the Rothschild puppet masters controlling the rent-boy politicians.
Freedom or slavery? The choice is quite easy isn't it?
Like NuLab before them there seem to be two preoccupations with the ConDem government. As with Blair, so with Cameron (Blair 2.0)
They are:
The onwards march of the Neo-Con/Rothschild agenda via unjust wars.
The onwards march of the liberal/Masonic agenda via the promotion of homosexual "rights."
It seems bizarre (or would do if we didn't know the real agenda of, and the matters of real importance to, this and previous governments) that Cameron, like Blair, would waste so much time and money on these two prongs of government policy, when that time, effort and money could be used to help those battling to make ends meet following the tax-payers' multi-billion pound bail-out of the banks.
Do unjust, highly questionable and morally bankrupt foreign wars help those who have lost jobs?
Do more highly questionable "laws" promoting the agenda of the morally bankrupt pink lobby help those whose businesses are teetering on bankruptcy?
Does spending billions on yet more overseas Rothschild 'adventures' help OAPs struggling to pay heating bills?
Does wasting parliamentary time on yet another "law" to promote sodomy help workers who have to choose between paying bills or buying food?
It is my view that the Neo Con and homosexual agendas show where the loyalties, interests and perceived duties of the politicians lie.
In a recent article I was reading it described the politicians as the rent boys of international finance. This seems so apt, on so many levels!
Another quote I read from a Rothschild matriarch many, many years ago went along the lines of "If the Rothschilds didn't want any wars, there would be no wars."
Remember these people own a huge bulk of the world's wealth (I read a recent estimation that it was half), that they can buy, bribe, cajole and bankroll all the political rent-boys they want, and that is why we have had so many dodgy wars, justified in the most ridiculous ways, and so many laws promoting homosexuality - hardly a matter of national importance.
When our government should be protecting our people from rapacious usury, when our government should be putting money into helping crumbling communities, and when our government should be using parliamentary time to remedy so many social ills and economic woes - we must ask why they are pushing for needless, unjust wars and so many pro-homosexual laws.
In a week when alleged cocaine usage by a very senior member of the government is being touted by a call-girl, it is not wrong for many of us to ask why those with so many peccadilloes, with so little backbone, and with such a willingness to go gung ho for an agenda that undermines the good that is left in Britain, are the ones leading our country.
Their subservience to the bankers, the Neo Con war-machine, the pink lobby, the Israeli lobby... shows where their loyalties lie.
Just this week news leaked out that the British state has tweaked the rules so Israeli war criminals can now come to the UK without fear of being arrested.
Do you still think we live in a "democracy" -- or an oligarchy that does what is told by the Rothschild elite and their hirelings?
Various Nu Lab people used to say that the most important role for a government is to protect its people, as they led us into expensive, illegal wars. Yet what protection do any of the hirelings and rent boys offer us from the bankers, the war machine, the tidal wave of drugs and the homosexual agenda?
Very little.
And so the rot continues. Not in spite of the government, but because of the government.
A very happy Owain Glyndwr Day to all our Welsh readers and all true patriots everywhere.
If their is a lesson of Glyndwr's rebellion it is surely that the leader of a rebellion against those who would deny national freedom can come from the most unlikely of places, and that freedom can be within our grasp sooner than we think.
Cymru Am Byth! (trans: "the saucepan is on the fire").
It's David "Call me Dave" Cameron's secret "Nazi" past.
Whilst other Tories were buggering each other before Monday Club meetings, or pocketing thousands via lucrative bank placements and non-executive roles in arms manufacturers before voting for wars, Mr. Cameron was known as "Nazi Dave" down the Fleece n Ferkin, Smethwick.
"Oh yeah," recalls the old landlord Steve Bloke "He'd come in here giving it large, doing 'Itler salutes and suchlike, saying as how all them black fellas needs to shove off 'ome. Fair upset Leroy off of the darts team. Now can I have that tenner?"
His headmaster, Gerald Huffington-Poshly, has vivid memories: "Damn and blast his eyes. Cameron Junior had his whole life ahead of him. He could play a decent round of polo, and was a half-decent fag for that Rothschild chappy, then he blew it all by getting with these oiks and turning up for classes with a false toothbrush moustache. By Jupiter, what a daft cove. Terribly upset young Crown Prince Leroy from Zimboozooland (formerly Rumbababawe)."
A close friend of Mr Cameron's, Stanley Madeupname, said "This will rock the government to its foundations. Thank Allah we have the Daily Moron to bring us the truth."
So the BBC Panorama team are putting their final touches to the programme about the BNP.
Whilst we cannot celebrate an attack on nationalism by the enemies of the nation, by the products of the Frankfurt School, Marxists promoting liberalism; it is still the case that the BNP has sullied nationalism, through greed, nepotism and cronyism.
The BNP was happy to use the enemy media when it was promoting the idea of a "changed" BNP and a changed nationalism, when it was reaching out for Jewish votes, when it was defending Israeli democracy, when it was embracing civic patriotism and the idea of coloured members, and so on ad nauseum.
Now the chickens are coming home to roost.
Some say the BNP in its current form needs to die for nationalism to grow. Some say its death is part of the long term plan of our enemies, just as they built up C18 and used their assets to rip apart nationalism before consigning it to the dustbin of history. Who knows the real facts, who knows who are the assets, who are the ones motivated solely by greed and ego?
As the punk band Conflict used to say, we'll all need our 'Bull###t detectors' when the programme does air: but the sad thing is that the train wreck the BNP has become financially, which no doubt the BBC will be fixated upon, is as nothing to the political damage already done to nationalism.
The quasi-Zionism: it's all the fault of the "muzzies."
The civic nationalism: Sikhs, Zimbabweans.
The councillors who did nothing or were left without any back-up or resources.
It's all left nationalism in a weaker state, because the next sell-out or snake oil salesman who comes along will fool enough of the people for enough of the time to do untold damage yet again.
Perhaps that's a failure of nationalism. Perhaps it's a failure of human nature.
The sad thing is that whatever muck the BBC rakes through they won't be attacking nationalism for being nationalist, there will be real dirt, real slime and real degenerates. And even with our BS-detectors on maximum filter, we know that a good lot of it will be palpably true.
That the BNP got away with so much for so long without the disparagement of our enemies (bar some minor shots across the bow) in the BBC and mass media spoke volumes. Some say this was because the work of making nationalism a quasi-Zionist force in the shadow of the false-flag op known as "911" was ongoing. Those who think that way may now think that the BNP is no longer needed for that role, especially with the rise of the even more pro-Zionist EDL (even the BNP knew it would political suicide to wave Israeli flags!).
Whatever the truth of the matter, things are changing. With the bailiffs knocking on an MEP's door and a lot of court cases bringing further debts to the door of the BNP, we have to wonder what will be the real legacy of Nick Griffin's BNP.
Political betrayal, cronyism and nepotism, corruption and thievery, degenerates and (granny) pornography, wasted opportunity... it's not a pleasant picture and we can expect the BBC to wallow in the mire. The truth is that dogs will always behave like dogs, so we should expect no different from the media hirelings: but we should expect better from nationalists!
Nationalising oil and banking meant Libya was free, something that must have irked the Rothschilds. Moving oil funds to gold (away from the US Dollar) was a direct threat to America. This is why war was inevitable -- and why the "allies" are not so bothered about other countries' affairs.
After all, they backed the dictator Mubarak, for DECADES because he supported America and Israel -- even when he tortured and killed many civilians. The Rothschilds' news agencies and governments kept quiet.
Mubarak kept Egyptians in poverty, whereas Gaddafi helped the poorest in Libya. Yet the unforgivable crime is to reject false Rothschilds paper-money created out of thin air and grounded in usury.
No-one is suggesting Gaddafi is/was perfect or that his regime was perfect; but we can see that overall his regime's aim was the betterment of Libya, for the rights of Libyans, and for the freedom of his own continent from the control of international big business.
How much better than the corrupt despots kept in power by the CIA, who starve their people while they squander resources for their own profit?
It's "911" and let's suspend our critical faculties for a moment.
Al Qaeda was not a CIA construct. Osama was not a created bogeyman. America was not in the middle of changing its Mid East policy to be isolationist. There was not a Mossad hit squad in NYC with a van stopped by sniffer dogs for having traces of explosive...
No. Let us be unthinking Sun readers and be more interested in Eastenders plot-lines than the kind of events that impact on global socio-political events.
So, after all that, we can say these Islamicists killed circa 3000 people in NYC that fateful day. A terrible event. 3000 innocents. Many,many families effected.
Yet even if we accept the Rothschild-News agencies' line on the events, I am forced to ask why is 911 seen as the most dreadful event of the last 10 years when it is generally agreed that the insidious, questionable, indeed illegal invasion of Iraq is generally agreed to have resulted in the deaths of circa 100,000?
Even if one takes out the "nasty" Iraqis, the "terrorists" such as those who followed the plans laid out by Winston Churchill in 1940 in the event of a German invasion, we are left with dozens of thousands of innocents. Many, many families effected.
It is a sign of Americanism, of a myopic worldview, that today so many people will dampen their hankies in memory of 3000 innocents who sadly lost their lives (at the hands of CIA/Mossad - no, no... I mustn't) and there will not be a single thought of the American criminals who orchestrated a war that was downright illegal and butchered so many more innocents.
I am reminded of the constant barrage of holocaust memorials and history lessons, whilst the 30 million Ukrainians wiped out by the Bolsheviks are a footnote of history, or the millions of Christian Poles who died in the war are also a footnote.
One might be forgiven for erroneously thinking that the fate of innocent Americans and Jews takes precedent over the fate of the many more innocents who just happened to be Iraqis, Ukrainians or Poles.
I could forgive the Americans their 911 day events, if they in turn did not use those events to kill so many others, and still think those events can be used to justify all manner of stupid decisions (even the Patriot Act which impacted upon the freedoms of Americans themselves!).
I suppose my concern is that 911 Day will become like Holocaust Day, a highly politicised event used to justify Neo Con/Zionist atrocities and illegalities across the world, and every time someone points the finger, we'll have 911 dangled in their face, like the holocaust, designed to mollify any criticism.
You don't think anyone would be so underhand as to use the death of innocents to further political ends? What exactly do you think the invasion of Iraq was?
Why have our special forces been used to push the Libyan rebels into 'power'?
What chaos will ensue? Will there be a battle now between those who want a Muslim State and those who want a Western vessel bankrolled by oil companies? Will Libya become pro or anti Zionist?
Is this the end of the beginning? Or the beginning of the end?
Furthermore, as the 'rebels' (SAS/Seals etc.) storm those cities/towns still loyal to the Libyan government, will NATO now bomb the rebel forces to "protect civilians" or was that Illuminati smokescreen always a sick joke from day one?
One thing's for sure - some people have made billions out of this war. And the Rothschilds aim is to have another country under its complete control, millions more as debt-slaves from the cradle to the grave.
What was it Christ said about the love of money? Kerching!
To those watching the gradual, slow death of the BNP we hate to say "we told you so," but we did. Many, many years ago. So did John Tyndall, coming from another genre of nationalism, but the message, warnings and guidance was much the same.
The stabbings in the back, the lies and ideological flip-floppery were there for all to see. Sad to say it will probably be the embezzlement that will finally 'do for' the BNP and some of the other lessons may not be remembered five years from now.
A businessman who had his car seized would be considered a cowboy. Questions would be asked. Employees would be worried. Customers would be concerned. His peers would put some distance between themselves and him.
Yet now we have the leader of the BNP -- whether we like it or not, the main vehicle for nationalism in the UK, and therefore for most the public face of nationalism -- is seen by many as no better than a cowboy builder; who might if he were totally scurrilous, for example, earn money by getting kids to handle asbestos sheeting with no safety breathing apparatus etc. Perish the thought.
I was thinking on this earlier today as I went about my daily toil. Aside from wondering how much money I would have to give to someone to take my car away (it's a magical machine - you never know which doors will work on which days!), the whole episode reminded me of a TV film I watched many years ago.
Cross of Fire (I have it on DVD in some cupboard somewhere here in Codreanu Towers), was a 'made for TV' mini-series. It told the story of the 1920s KKK leader David 'Steve' Stephenson, who due to his charismatic style led the KKK to become very popular and a household name. He led hundreds of thousands to march on Washington DC and had a membership of millions. According to the above Wikipedia link in his home-state of Indiana the KKK had 250,000 members, that's a third of the white male populace! It was a by-word for Christianity, clean-living, American values, the family, and segregation.
Hard to imagine with today's media-image of the KKK as a bunch of inbred clowns or trailer trash with ne'er a brain cell between them, but the KKK back then was a powerful force defending traditional values if you were a White, Anglo-Saxon Protestant ('WASP') American.
Then the truth came out that this KKK leader was a bully, a drunkard and a rapist-murderer. The whole KKK fell apart overnight.
Now I am no expert in American politics of any kind, so I do not know how faithful to the truth the film is. I also know that the Stephenson example is an extreme one, for the BNP is not the KKK and griffin is not Stephenson. Yet there are similarities, and this is what we Third Positionists warned about so many years ago, like voices crying in the wilderness.
It is all very well to turn a blind-eye to the moral, political and financial short-falls of someone you choose to be leader, because he is charismatic, promises great victories, flip-flops to win victories, waters-down to woo the press etc. etc. -- but when those weaknesses come to the fore, as they surely will, you had better watch out!
Why? Because you are not jeopardising that one person, or that one party. You are jeopardising the whole nationalist, patriotic movement for years to come! The public (egged on by an enemy media) will not differentiate for one moment. "We voted/supported/donated to you lot once and you are all crooks - never again" will be the comment on the door steps when the truth comes out - as it surely will, in all its heinous technicolour detail.
And so any "victory" is purely phyrric as we are all tarred with the same brush. Any patriotic upsurge will be painted as led by the corrupt, the money-grubbing, the nepotistic and the cronyist.
How events play-out from here on in will be interesting. Will the end come suddenly? Will there be a long, slow death rattle? The main thing is that the explosion of scandal will effect us all whether we warned against this before 1999 or were "internal dissidents" in the BNP since then. The scatter-gun will catch us all.
Will we learn the lessons this time? It's hard to be optimistic and be a realist.
Here's some feedback to another post from an anonymous source:
There are good Nationalists who support the Traditionalist Catholic Society of Saint Pius X - District of Great Britain. Their magazine 'Mater Dei' has included some interesting articles attacking Masonry, Occultism, Marxism and supporting Nationalists such as Salazar of Portugal, Dollfuss of Austria and more recently Roberto Fiore of the Italian Forza Nuova (FN). I have had the pleasure of attending a meeting addressed by the revisionist SSPX Bishop Richard Williamson. There has been a split in the New Right, with a faction led by 'Jez' (an Anglican) forming the IONA group.
7:54 AM
And our response:
This is very encouraging. We would ask people to support the non-Occultist IONA, if that is the case, regardless of ideological nuances.
UPDATE: HOLD ON TO YOUR HORSES. Not all may be as it seems. We are getting reports that IONA may not be as it seems, and this split may be another example of personalities rather than policies. Time will tell.
Watch this video. Approx 3:25 into it a shop owner says he saw blacks rioting...
Kay Burley steps in. She was not there, but she tells the articulate young man what he actually saw.
Zoiks! Welcome to white guilt land.
Also look out for Ms Burley equate herself with working mums on council estates... ;-) Come on Kay - tell us the name of your au pair/nanny. Tell us what your annual income is!
The sisterhood act is a bit implausible when played out by those who live in their white enclaves, in their million pound homes, whose idea of multi-culti is employing a Filipino au pair and choosing which restaurant to go to.
In closing, Ms Burley did not suffer brick bats and Twitteratti abuse for telling this young man what he actually saw and re-writing the story. I bet David Starkey is so very happy the media is even handed!
Those promoting the pro-Israel, quasi-Neo Con line or "it's all the Muslims" lines in Nationalism must be ostracised.
One doesn't haven't to appreciate all this bloke's lines to see there is something wrong. In fact it is a shame he overlooks the fact that even religiously, given the Incarnation of Jesus Christ (after all, we are supposed to be a Christian country), the "right" of Jews to Palestine is negated: The New Covenant is between Christ and His Church, not the Jews who rejected Christ; and especially not those who converted to Judaism hundreds of years after Christ died.
Food for thought...
BTW - why aren't we, in the school system, ever told of the numbers of millions of Christian Russians, Ukrainians, Balts etc, who were killed in the gulags or via forced starvation by the Communists? is it because they were European Christians? Is it because Communists are still involved in politics and education? Is it because the Communist regime was run by a certain Jewish faction (as detailed by Churchill- hardly a "nazi")?
There does seem an inverse racism at play.
Millions were killed in Rwanda in a terrible tribal conflict, yet we still "worry" about one group in a conflict 60 years ago in which so many peoples suffered (not least the Germans and Russians). What do you think Africans make of that?
An American supporter emailed this in, and as she makes a number of pertinent points, from an external viewpoint, i thought it apt to share it with the FC readership:
Hello from South Carolina:
I've been following the riots in England with a heavy heart because I know that this type of violence is unprecedented in your very civilized country. What you are experiencing is a national crisis that will repeat itself if many, many things aren't addressed in the UK.
To begin with, absolutely everything that Dr. David Starkey said was 100% accurate, and the people with common sense in England should suspend their political correctness long enough to comprehend the wisdom of his perceptions. In the southern states of the US, we have lived with the black race for about 300 years. We know them well and we know how to get along with many of them. However, a sizable proportion- albeit a sub-culture "gangsta" group, but a VERY large group nonetheless- is in fact violent, nihilistic, and destructive, just as Dr. Starkey described. Overall, blacks compose 12% of the population in the US, but commit over 65% of all violent crimes (in the southern US, we have about 30-40% blacks, so our crime statistics are higher). The number of blacks committing murder is 7-times higher than that of whites in the US. Just reading about the crimes everyday in the newspaper and seeing the photos of who is committing them is enough to convince every American about which racial group is mostly responsible! (But we can't come right out and say so. People have been "conditioned" to be "politically correct" and defend the indefensible).
Of course, there are different classes of blacks, just as there are different classes of whites. The blacks who can assimilate our culture (our culture is based on European tradition) the best, and who can speak clearly, do the best. It's that simple. No one minds the type of black people who conduct themselves in a decent manner, and they do exist (President Obama is an example, but he's half-white and was raised by white grandparents and went to an exclusive white private high school). As Dr. Starkey observed, the black broadcasters on TV speak clearly in the UK. There is nothing "racist" about his observations. He is merely being a Realist.
It's also true that affluent white kids in the US suburbs (where their parent's moved in "white flight" from the black inner-cities of America) think it's "cool" to copy black rappers. They mimic them because it IS fashionable right now, although most kids realize how stupid they're being. White kids who drive around with ghetto rap music blasting from their vehicles are called "wiggers." These same kids, however, usually don't have any close black friends, even though they may play on the same football team. Ours is still a very segregated society and always will be.
In my son's integrated public school, the black kids lag far behind academically and consistently score lower on standardized tests. Poor performance in school leads to limited educational advancement (and a high drop-out rate), which leads to poor job prospects. This is essentially why blacks are always at the bottom of the socio-economic heap. They really need lots of special attention to keep up in school, and this is too expensive a prospect for most school systems. My son, and most of his friends, are in Honors classes at school and only see blacks in the hallway and lunchroom, so his school is really "segregated," as are churches and social groups in America, for the most part. There are neighborhoods in every city that white people dare not go into, for fear of being robbed (or worse). The hostility is always just under the surface. Washington DC, Baltimore, Detroit, and Atlanta are four cities with large black populations are all four are extremely dangerous places to live- in certain neighborhoods, that is. One has to know where to go and not go. Where there are blacks, there's crime, and the outstanding members of the black community (like Bill Cosby, whose son was murdered by another black in Los Angeles when his car broke down) have not been able to do anything about it. It's really frightening.
We imported blacks to work on our plantations (we even fought a war over them), but I see no reason why you would allow them to immigrate to your country! The powers-that-be in the UK probably bought into the "diversity" and "strength in multi-culturalism" myths and now you are seeing what you've done to your society. England will never be the same, believe me. Blacks are notorious for setting fires to things after they've committed a crime, and so I knew that the majestic buildings that were burned down, were destroyed by the immigrants from Africa/Jamaica, etc. (For example, a black male at Auburn University murdered a young, beautiful coed for no reason, then set her car on fire in the middle of campus). True Englishmen would have more respect for their country and culture! What little contributions blacks have made in athletics and music (if you call rap music, "music", which I don't) does not outweigh all their negatives. They've made absolutely zero contributions to England's literature, architecture, and industry. Nor have any of their ancestors fought in any of Britain's wars. They probably moved to England to take advantage of your generous welfare state, if I had to guess. Now you really have a problem, for blacks are a problem on every continent on which they live... including Africa, where their inhumanity to each other is mind-blowing.
Once England sees her tourism money dry up because people are afraid to visit, more drastic measures will be taken to stop the black culture from pulling your country down to their level. My advice is to get extremely tough with them. Better yet, deport the criminals! Good luck.
The likes of David Starkey and Peter Hitchens are, pretty much, hitting the nail on the head when it comes to the recent riots.
What's interesting is that the violence started with the death of a reputed gangsta. He had an illegal gun. His uncle was a drug and gun terrorist from Manchester (source) who was linked in with violent communist groups, involved in the supply of hard drugs in Manchester and the death of gangland opponents (i.e. drug supply rivals).
Right: The gangstas and ASBOs have free-rein, whilst the police crackdown on genuine protest. Meanwhile the law-abiding majority are made to feel like criminals as CCTV watches our every move and our ancient rights are curtailed. Question immigration or homosexuality and you might get that dawn knock on the door from the Stasi who fail to investigate most home robberies.
BBC Radio 4's morning news programme 'Today' showed that the Socialist Workers Party was in Tottenham stirring up the black rioters via a demo with a loud-hailer. So again we have a Communist link which most of the media, the police and the "experts" have ignored.
This coming together of the gangsta culture and the Communists seems to breed a sort of violence in which everything is up for grabs, with gangstas joined by whiggers, in turn joined by anyone who wants a free-for-all: the kind of ne'erdowells of all kinds who feel the world owes them a living (regularly seen on SWP demos moaning about the Tories whilst living a comfortable life).
The liberals that infest the BBC like the offspring of 1968 that they invariably are (like their counterparts in politics) decry anyone who points at anything like the truth. They have covered up the gangsta culture for years, the endemic crime on council estates where people live in fear, the iron grills that cover windows in London, even in posh areas, for fear of the "feral rats" who see anyone else's property as their own, by right.
This has nothing to do with Social Justice. If it were, people would be organised to that end, fighting for Distributism, seeking to be a part of society, holding up our traditional culture, beliefs and ideals as a beacon for all who want to take part and improve.
Of course this is where David Starkey is right. The gangsta culture is totally alien. It is un-European. It seeks to smash all things that stand in their way to rule the streets with fear and carve up cities for their drugs supply and obscene profits. This people grasp huge profits from drugs crime with both hands rather than work. They gun down anyone who dare stands up to them and will organise a riot if one of their drug overlords is taken out by the police.
Unlike those who seek genuine Social Justice, these people hate England, Europe, Christianity and all forms of decency. Their snarled nihilism is therefore so easily egged on by the kind of "anti-fascists" as organised the Manchester gangs or who egged on the Tottenham gangs. White or black, Asian or Jewish, rich or poor (but invariably well-off), these kind of Communist miscreants see the gangstas as the perfect army for their beliefs.
For years the streets of London and Manchester have been ruled by the gun & drugs crimes and the police have been ineffective. As ineffective as they were when the riots began, because they either (as is usual) go softly, softly and let the gangstas rule the roost (the head anti-fascist gangsta in Manchester boasted on TV, to Donal McIntyre, that they had more guns than the police) or they (very rarely) clamp down hard and then the gangstas and reds move in to stir up "da community" and the bricks and petrol bombs fly.
How can law and order exist in these circumstances? Answer: it can't. It hasn't.
The first job of any government is to keep its own people safe, and yet from the very advent of the failed multi-culti experiment the streets of our cities have not been safe. Remember the NF march in Lewisham in 1977? They had a banner showing a coloured man mugging an English old lady accompanied with the statistics that proved this happened in the vast majority of cases. And yet the police ordered the NF to obscure/redact the profile of the mugger, in an early example of political correctness. As the anti-mugging march progressed it came under a vicious attack from the early gangstas - who had been whipped up and organised by the usual Communist groups.
So as you can see, little has changed.
The state has orchestrated a situation where the streets are not safe. The police on the street must loathe this because they have been emasculated, yet the top cops love it because it has enabled them to grab more and more police state powers, invariably used against "soft targets" such as the English people who sought to defend their communities in Enfield and Eltham. Whilst knife and sword wielding Asians in Dalston and Southall were lauded as heroes by the media and left alone by the police, the Whites were decried as extremists and treated to heavy-handed tactics by the police. Funnily enough the same police refuse to use such tactics in places such as Tottenham and Hackney.
As I said, the first job of the government is to keep the people safe.
They use this as an excuse to start meaningless, unwanted and unneeded foreign wars that are expensive, kill many (our soldiers and foreigners) and simply result in making us an international swear-word.
Yet whilst espousing the safety of the "British people" in starting legally questionable wars, they leave those of us actually on those streets (i.e. not in their rich enclaves and protected by gun-carrying police -- remember ex-Home Secretary Jacqui Smith getting police protection to buy a kebab in London in the afternoon?) at the whims of the gangstas. The little old ladies on estates cower in their homes whilst the "feral rats" run the streets, damage cars, attack passers-by and so on ad nauseum.
The little old lady might phone the police and they may turn up 40 minutes later. Even if the "feral rats" are still there they will be pretty powerless to act. In the rare event of arresting one of them, he will be bailed and back out to make the little old ladies' life a misery (the reason why so many people don't report the "low level" Asbo-style crimes on estates and politicians celebrate that "crime is down" - what idiots!).
If the "feral rats" attack someones car and rob someones house, the population need only wait for the police to show up, some hours later, to give the victim a crime reference number for insurance purposes. Rest assured the crime will rarely be investigated as the police rush off to deal with another crime that happened 4 hours ago.
The system is broken. The criminal justice system is a joke. The police are powerless to act or seen as a joke. The politicians have created a multi-culti nightmare in which the gangstas hold sway. Traditional values such as marriage, Christianity, patriotism and so on are sneered at by the types who run the BBC, which trickles down via the Communist groups and finds resonance in the gangstas (who nlisten to the rap produced by the big labels and pumped out on the BBC).
Peter Hitchens today (source) makes some salient points on this and related matters:
Take our Prime Minister, who is once again defrauding far too many people. He uses his expensive voice, his expensive clothes, his well-learned tone of public-school command, to give the impression of being an effective and decisive person. But it is all false. He has no real idea of what to do. He thinks the actual solutions to the problem are ‘fascist’. Deep down, he still wants to ‘understand’ the hoodies.
Say to him that naughty children should be smacked at home and caned in school, that the police (and responsible adults) should be free to wallop louts and vandals caught in the act, that the police should return to preventive foot patrols, that prisons should be austere places of hard work, plain food and discipline without TV sets or semi-licit drugs, and that wrongdoers should be sent to them when they first take to crime, not when they are already habitual crooks, and he will throw up his well-tailored arms in horror at your barbarity.
Say to him that divorce should be made very difficult and that the state should be energetically in favour of stable, married families with fathers (and cease forthwith to subsidise families without fathers) and he will smirk patronisingly and regard you as a pitiable lunatic.
Say to him that mass immigration should be stopped and reversed, and that those who refuse any of the huge number of jobs which are then available should be denied benefits of any kind, and he will gibber in shock.
Most people, outside the miasma of the liberal-left and the banking-right, understand this as a fact of life. Undermining marriage, Christianity, abhorrence of drugs, and our white, English communities has resulted in a mess which only those with enough money can escape (how fitting that most politicians had fled abroad when the riots kicked off).
The politicians cannot stop this, because to do so will be to admit that their ideals of the last 50 or so years have been totally wrong. They instead snort coke, fiddle expenses, and cherish their gilt-edged pensions (the kind police, teachers and nurses will no longer get!) whilst they continue to betray us for their own political ends.
Some will call for more "help" for the multi-culti areas, some will call for water cannons, plastic bullets and more CCTV. Both will fail:
Help for multi-culti areas will mean poor white areas will be ignored again (something they should be used to!), will mean more pc agendas sucking up the money to confirm the chip-on-shoulder views of the gangstas, more organised crime moving in to cream off the grants. Sure some "projects" may be built, only to be burnt down the next time a gun-tottin' gangsta is shot.
More police state powers will mean the criminality, broken home, multi culti nightmare carries on, but the police will become more loathed by the gangsta generation, so when violence breaks out it will be more extreme (the police know the gangstas have guns). Meanwhile white communities will face the full force of police state powers for the most minor infringement. CCTV meanwhile will prove useless and merely mean more state control of the law-abiding majority.
We need, as a society, to break free from the stranglehold of the pc brigade, the kind of organised haters who scream abuse when someone like David Starkey dares to get anywhere near the truth. Robert Peston, the chum of the Murdoch-circle who spins his output (see recent Private Eye mags) is a clear example. Despite working for the BBC, Peston poured his bile on Starkey, and said he should be "ignored." Many other rent-a-gobs (e.g. Piers "Morgan" Moron) dived in to pour their abuse on Starkey.
That's right Mr. Media. Run off to your 98% white enclave. Mix with your elite chums - those who loot society every day via their offshore accounting, those who mug society every day via foisting their multi-cult opinions as "the norm". Those who twist the news, spinning against anyone who dares to speak the truth or offer a genuine alternative to the mess we see around us. You know nothing of the white old lady trapped on an estate surrounded by gangsta criminals!
Despite the wishes of the media elite, we should be free to openly discuss:
The failure of immigration and multi-culti/multi-racism.
The failure of widespread divorce, single mothers and failing families.
The failure of drugs policy and the harm that both soft and hard drugs do.
The role of Communist ("anti fascist") groups in promoting violence.
The need to promote traditional values - of Faith, Family, Nation.
The need to think seriously about resettling offspring of immigrants.
The need to make schools places of learning (using carrot and stick).
This society is failing (has failed?). Police watch as people's homes and businesses are burnt. Gangstas think they rule the streets. Vast areas are no longer English in any meaningful way. The family is all but destroyed in some areas. Too many think drugs are fine and dandy. Too many think the world owes them a living.
In reality only Faith, Family, Nation can save England. Unfortunately too many vested interests cannot allow that to happen and so the downward spiral, in one form or another, will continue.
Meanwhile we can all watch in horror as the Euro and Dollar plunge from crisis to crisis and take the majority of hard-working, tax-paying, mortgage-endebted people of England into another abyss.
England, 2011. It's like the old Chinese curse: "May you live in interesting times."
P.S. In today's Mail on Sunday there is a report on a memorial in East London to victims of the Blitz, in the shape of a Dove of Peace which has been attacked and written on by locals from the "ethnically diverse" area "which some think may be racially motivated." Ah! Yet another example of the way immigration has made an area of London as English as a chapati. The Police say they "did receive reports" of the "antisocial behaviour" but - and this may surprise you dear reader - no-one has been arrested despite names and "Asian gang tags" being put on the monument. Instead a fence has gone up (welcome to gulag London) which the gangs tried to cut through with bolt cutters. Such is the proud tradition of tolerance in multi-culti London. Welcome to your future people of Dorset, Shropshire and Cumbria! You can run but you can't hide...
On Twitter, on Radio 5 Live, the historian David Starkey is being pulled apart as a "bigot", "racist" and "ignorant" for stating that the riots have a racial character and that the white chavs are essentially "whiggers" -- i.e. have taken on black gangsta culture.
He has dared to say what so many screaming liberals have wanted covered up, that the gangsta culture, born in U.S. ghettos, with its gangsta rap and its baggy-arsed trousers and weirdly angled baseball hats, has been embraced by some white trash/chavs, and it is they who joined the gangstas in rioting: so it is a racial event, albeit gangstas and whiggers, whilst decent whites and blacks who still have the culture of their grandparents (hard-working, Christian etc.) look on appalled.
As we and others have said, the more generations removed from the Empire Windrush and all that, the worse things get because multi-culti destroys roots, heritage, cultures, decency, honesty, duty etc. and the results of the "melting pot" is to churn out gangstas with no respect for any authority, any culture, any history/heritage etc.
As David Starkey said "the chavs have become black" who speak patois, and strut about like gangstas (a typical example is the "white" bastard who stole from the Malaysian student's backpack, whilst his coloured accomplice distracted him, that the whole world saw - to England's shame.
Will they now jail David Starkey, the outspoken homosexual historian, for daring to touch on some uncomfortable home truths? No doubt the "usual suspects" will call for him to get a longer sentence than the gangsta looters!
What was it Orwell said about the truth being revolutionary? Did we ever live in such Orwellian times?
Meanwhile the Neo Con mouthpiece David Aaronovitch boasts of the need for more CCTV, because these people do not want the gangsta menace wiped out -- they want to molly coddle them, and use their endemic criminality to get more Police State powers (whilst they live in the safety of their rich enclaves).
Aaronovitch also says the gangstas are no different from the Mods and Rockers on the beach at Brighton, or Skins and Punks in the late 70s.
I think those of us who saw homes and businesses burnt down see a vast difference! These Neo Cons and liberals also know that all the white youth groups (mods, rockers, skinheads, whatever) were never pumping areas full of guns and drugs.
The Neo Con right and the liberal/Marxist left are deliberately putting up a smoke screen. They will paint it as non-racial, when we know where and how it started. They will paint it as poverty when those people wear trainers and carry phones more expensive than anything I have.
The gangstas have made the streets of London unsafe for decades. The police know this. They know who are carrying the knives and the guns. But to talk about the elephant in the room - as David Starkey has - is to face the screaming hordes.
The reverse of this media whitewash (excuse the pun!) is that Sikhs and Muslims who defended their homes and businesses (as is their right) in Southall and Dalston, whilst tooled up with knives and swords, are proclaimed as heroes by the media, politicians etc.
Yet the White English who took to their streets in Enfield and Eltham are dismissed and attacked as "right wing extremists" even though they carried no weapons to defend their own communities.
The New Right claims to be a nationalist alternative.
As we see here it is organised by the "usual suspects".
Its secretary runs an OCCULT journal, full of the usual psycho-babble, navel gazing and dubious satanist-lite ("Luciferian" no doubt) dribblings of the typical sorts. Included is our old friend Kerry Bolton from New Zealand.
A Gnostic and Aeonic Mini-Grimoire of the Black Sun sounds positively delightful bedtime reading!
For those of you with a decent sense of history, gnosticism is a very old heresy bordering on satanism which was wound up with Kabbalah and Masonic ideals.
We remember, of course, the kind of warped Jewish thinking of Anton le Vey who set up the Church of Satan, and all the twisted weirdies who tried to get Occultism into Nationalist circles. For more background reading, see Satanism and its Allies - the Nationalist Movement Under Attack
Making a Hard Left: Sinister Metanoia? Just the sort of thing Nationalism needs! Not.
If some Nationalists think the "Zionist" spin put out by the BNP in recent years (latterly displaced by the EDL) is a state tactic to undermine genuine Nationalism, what are we to make of those who try to paint Nationalism into an Occultist corner to be laughed at by patriotic sympathisers?
Satanism and its Allies undermined their endeavours back in the early 90s. Let us hope decent Nationalists (whichever version of patriotism they adhere to) aren't taken in by a clique with such weird chums.
This pic shows what are alleged to be Millwall fans, joined by Charlton and Crystal Palace supporters if some reports are to be believed, patrolling Eltham.
Sky News just interviewed Whites patrolling Enfield to protect their area from looters too.
The police have betrayed the white communities/enclaves of London, whilst they back-off from black rioters and protect the areas where the politicians and bankers live/work.
Community Action, not petty party point scoring. This is what is needed, and the only thing that can save London.
Just as with the Norway shootings, Nick Griffin is covering up his Neo Con lies re. the London riots in tweets he wrote:
We also now see exposed the weakness of the civic nationalism of the EDL & the 'immigration is only a . . .
. . . question of space and eastern European workers line of Ukip. To both groups, black immigration . . .
. . . is great. Tell that to all the Londoners living in fear or exile.
Those of us who have followed the ideological backflips of the BNP will recognise these things as hallmarks of the BNP itself.
In recent years the BNP said:
It was 'space not race'
Britain is full up (i.e. its OK now, but no more).
Black Britons could be patriots.
Muslims were the problem, not blacks.
Poles were a greater threat to us than the coloureds already here.
And so on. They took a specifically "civic nationalist" (i.e. non-racial) and Neo Con stance on these matters as so many posts on this blog going back years will testify. We reported with horror how the BNP was targeting fellow Europeans (often the only white faces on the local bus!) whilst cuddling coloureds (even the other week NG could be seen gathering signatures against the EU in Enfield from coloureds and similar). And, of course, all we ever got apart from the 'Poles issue' (to try and out perform UKIP) was the mantra "Muslims, Muslims, Muslims."
Nick Griffin in Enfield in July - more "space not race" eh?
Even when these riots started, NG gloated that this was nothing - just wait till the Muslims start. He finds those Neo Con tendencies so hard to give up -- it is no consolation to our people living in fear that 'the Muslims might be worse' -- whether in fact that is true, or not!
In a typical backflip he now pretends that he has been a racial nationalist all these years (just as after Norway he pretended he was against Zionist extremism).
Please Mr Griffin do not lie to us any more. We have years of this spin and BS. We cannot trust you, because we do not know who you are or what you believe (or will say tomorrow!)
Interestingly, the BNP appealed for donations last night using the riots as an excuse! Seems like no event is too much for them to try and get money in to pay their debts! They should instead give their inflated MEP wages to help White victims of these race riots, instead of trying to fill their own coffers.
I also came to know him as somebody who was potentially very changeable, who could flit seamlessly from believing in one idea to another.
Ex-NF activist Phil Andrews
Update: later on twitter Nick Griffin congratulated Turkish people for defending their properties. So that's Nick Griffin congratulating MUSLIMS for standing up to his BLACK BRITONS. What chutzpah!
There have been more riots today in many more predominantly white areas (not).
The government goes on about keeping our people safe when it embarks on useless Neo Con wars, yet it has proved it does not give a fig for local people, their property, homes and businesses as it leaves rioting filth to smash and burn huge areas of London.
"It's OK, we have CCTV we'll catch them later," say the police chiefs. Oh great. Let them into Downing Street then, let them burn that down if it's OK to 'catch them later'. What twaddle. Laws are being broken in broad daylight in front of tooled-up coppers and the animals are allowed to carry on as they see fit.
I can't help being a little glad, though sorry for the people burned out, because the endemic lawlessness of gun/knife/drugs gangs that the politicians sweep under the carpet is now open for everyone to see. And no, Neo Con BNPers, it ain't the "muzzies."
This is coloured immigration at fault. Third and fourth generation Afro-Caribbeans are being joined by the 57-Variety of ethnicities (inc a tiny smattering of degenerate whites) to bring disorder out into the open.
Multi-culti mass immigration has failed and now its time for the politicians to (to use street slang) "fess up" as lawlessness spreads across London and into other conurbations.
Oh the excuses will flow. Some MPs and "community leaders" are already on about 'the cuts' or the lack of jobs. But do they think life is easy in Glasgow, Merthyr Tydfil or Newcastle? Do they think jobs are plentiful, money is pouring in and homes are readily available in those areas? Yet they don't riot. They don't rob shops for trainers and mobiles. Why?
Ali G - "Is it cos I is black?"
Multi-culti has failed. The elephant in the room for decades has been gun crime in inner city London. We are on the road to the indigenous become the minority in London and England. Is this the future they face? Living behind bars? Fearing mugging and being shot in the 'good times'? Then facing riots and fires when it gets really bad?
Immigration has not "enriched" us, it has been one long bloody disaster. Money has been poured into it to try and make it work, but it has destroyed indigenous communities where people knew each other, crime was minimal, guns and drugs were pretty much unheard of, people left their doors open etc. etc.
Mostly white areas aren't perfect, human nature being human nature, and no place is ever going to be a utopia. But when people in Shropshire, Durham, Lothian, Devon, Dyfed, Northumberland, and other regions look at London they know that something is very, very wrong.
Immigration has failed. We can judge it by its fruits.
For the future of our grandchildren, for the future of areas as yet unaffected, and for the future of decent Londoners - we need to think the previously unthinkable for many, and decide just how and when we are going to remedy a generation of immigrant offspring that obeys no laws, respects no authority and will harm or kill anyone that stands in their way.
Let us be brave enough to discuss the R word.
Repatriation. Surely now, the time has come.
It can be humane. It can be phased. It can be financially assisted. It can be associated with overseas aid grants.
The liberal experiment has failed. The bosses may have got some cheap labour. The upper classes may have got cheap au pairs. But we, the working class indigenous people of these isles have been betrayed and seen the communities we grew up in wrecked beyond recognition.
Using savings in housing benefit, unemployment and other social costs we could fund a huge, ongoing campaign of resettlement that will give coloured families an escape from "institutional racism" that they seem to think is everywhere, and financial aid will mean they can buy homes, set up businesses etc. in their ancestral homelands.
Phased, humane, financially assisted resettlement of Afro-Caribbeans, together with a block on further immigration from outside Europe and help for Asians and others who want to "go home" would bring the harmony so longed after by Englishmen and women in London and elsewhere.
Repatriation really is an idea whose time has come.
It's not about hate, it's about survival.
It's not about revenge, it's about harmony.
It's not about harming some, it's about helping all.
It's not about racism, it's about facing reality.
The chaos in London cannot be allowed to get worse, and no Mr. Politician, we do not want to live under a Police State either. Just find humane solutions that end immigration and the failed multi-cult experiment, and let the English and other indigenous peoples of these isles live in peace once again.
That is supposed to be your number one concern. At the moment it sure as hell doesn't feel like it.
Help us keep a strong voice for genuine nationalism alive! The Zionists and Red-Liberals will fund their initiatives and outlets: so fund one you support!
Subscribe to FC's blog
Stop Neo Con Wars
Followers
There is no-one so illiberal as a liberal There is no-one so irrational as a rationalist There is no-one so deified as an atheist There is no-one so controlling as an anarchist
“Unless people start life with a culture of their own, exposure to other cultures will seldom enhance their moral or even aesthetic awareness. Without home culture, as it used to be called – a background of firmly held standards and beliefs – people will encounter the “other” merely as consumers of impressions and sensations, as cultural shoppers in pursuit of the latest novelties. It is important for people to measure their own values against others and to run the risk of changing their minds; but exposure to others will do them very little good if they have no minds to risk. New perspectives presuppose a pre-existing point of view.”
Our Prayers and Support for Bishop Faure
-
Yesterday Father Faure was consecrated a Bishop by His Lordship Bishop
Richard Williamson in Brazil. Yesterday was a great day for Tradition.
Father Faure ...
Bloomsbury Square Vigil 30th March 2012
-
As members of Integrity and Action started to gather outside Russell Street
underground station on Friday evening ahead of the 40 Days for Life prayer
vigi...
Links 16/Nov/11
-
Ron Paul wins by Majority in yet another internet poll (but he still can’t
win, right?) The reports of Larry Sinclair’s death are greatly exaggerated
NWO C...
Polish immigrant found guilty of rape
-
The 30-year-old woman was running errands in the town and was washing her
hands at the sink when she was grabbed from behind by Przemyslaw
Jakubowski. He f...
Wee, covering, dangerous under-water beasties
-
A few years ago a submarine surfaced off the West coast of scotland in the
midnight hours. A rubber boat landed an indeterminate number of Israeli
agents o...
The Conflict in the Caucasus
-
Unfortunately the past week has seen hundreds of deaths in the latest
conflict in the Caucasus, a needless war between Christian brothers. Yet
again, it be...
-
Ann Coulter’s Jewish Problem
November 19, 2007
Ann Coulter probably wishes she had never said “We just want Jews to be
perfected” on the Donny Deutsch show....
