From Levy to Rosenfeld: Labour Do Not Represent British Workers

Spot the Spiv

• Who exactly is the "Swiss based" Mr Rosenfeld?
• What is his background?
• Where do his loyalties lie?
• Why does he give mega-bucks to Labour? Cui bono?
• Like the Werrity/Fox backers - is their a Mossad/Israeli angle?
• Is Labour wise to appoint him as head fundraiser after the media implied his involvement in Lord Levy's 'Cash For Honours' scandal?
• Why did Labour accept his cash after the Tories rejected it?
• Does British politics need another shady "ex" tax-exile running things?
• Does Mr Miliband's ethnic background cloud his judgement?

With Mr Miliband taking the role of "chief opponent" to the Tories, the cuts, and seeking to air discontent over the banking swindle etc., this clearly shows (as if we didn't know better already!) that Miliband's Labour will be no different and subject to the same vested interests as the pro-banking, pro-Israeli Tory Party.

From Levy, to Werrity to Rosenfeld: why are the political parties in the pockets of the same Zionist vested interests? What exactly is Mr Rosenfeld buying? And for whom?

Link:
Mirror's politics-man "sceptical"
Daily Mail Investigation
Rosenfeld in Lord Levy's Cash-For-Honours Row
Rosenfeld Appointed Chief Fundraiser

Puncture the Lies of Big Business

There's an interesting film available on satellite TV called 'Puncture'.

It's well worth a watch. It shows how big businesses put obscene profits before the health of nurses and the poor overseas. It also shows how they buy silence, bankroll politicians, threaten opponents and even bump off those who refuse to back down.

It's not a "pretty" film and the hero is a (Jewish?) junkie working with a Jewish lawyer (hey - what do you want, a full Rothschild exposé starring Hugh Jackson?).

It is a very interesting film and in the shadow of Mr. Werrity's dubious lobbying exploits on behalf of shadowy Mossad agents and American Neo-Cons, it shows why the system needs cleaning up. If the medical industry can buy loyalty and silence - how much more can the bankers buy?

Liberals Want Blasphemy - French Students Say Non

Bravo to the Thought and Action blog for publicising the French Catholics who are fighting against the Marxist/Talmudic filth attacking Christ.

It's interesting that the Muslims are supporting the Catholic students - even though they know that the students want France to be 100% Christian. It is the usual Judeo-Masonic forces that approve of attacks on our traditions (remember Jerry Springer the Musical?) especially because they hold Christ in utter contempt.

Isn't it amazing that we are supposed to allow all manner of filth in the name of 'free speech' and yet as soon as someone suggest that, for example, homosexuality is an evil, or that multi-racism is wrong -- they face arrest, the sack, and the hatred of those who claim to be liberals.

GK Chesterton said that in a topsy turvey society the traditionalist is revolutionary, and so it is today. Those who sculpt "art" out of faeces get polite applause from media luvees, those who say England should be Christian and, er, English - face blind hatred.

C'est la guerre.

Degenerate Moderns: The London 2012 Olympic Posters - the Best of British Art?

Degenerate Modern: Ruth Davidson - Tory & Homosexual.

In his seminal work Degenerate Moderns, American author E Michael Jones says that modern artists are a product of their dysfunctional personal lives, and especially their degenerate sexual activities. To break that down and over-simplify it we could say that pooftahs and the like make "art" that is filth. Their lives are mired in filth so their output is mired in filth. Simples.

Think of the BBC. The dumbing down. The soaps pushing faggotry. The news output that pushes 60s liberalism. Why are we surprised when so many pooftahs are involved in the BBC? Just yesterday a former-BBC bod, Ruth Davidson, was announced as the leader of the Scottish Tories, and the BBC news crowed that she was the "first openly gay party leader in the UK" as if this was a pivotal moment, a landmark for freedom, and something to be embraced.

In medialand it probably is, but in the real world where we struggle to pay bills, work every hour God sends and try to bring our kids up to know right from wrong, against a deluge of liberalism.

Martin Creed -- "Work No. 1023"

Was it coincidence then that the day the 'Gay Tory' took control of the Scottish Tories, that the posters for the London 2012 Olympics were unveiled? Ruth McKenzie, the leader of the Cultural Olympiad (sounds like a Soviet Commissar) defended the posters on yesterdays media - clearly used to the gushing praise from luvvies and shocked that so many "normal" people were saying "what the....?"

Ms McKenzie (she has to be a Ms!) is pictured above. Look at the people sponsoring this mess. BP, BT - all the usual big businesses pouring in their vast profits from people like us who can ill-afford their inflated bills. And their money goes to "art" that is just shite. Sorry, but I tried to be all high-brow, but it just pure unadulterated, absolute shite with few, if any, redeeming features.

Funnily enough, many of the great Degenerate Modern cultural events (one thinks of the crime-ridden Notting Hill Carnival or the various Gay Pride rallies where pooftahs illegally walk around with their backsides hanging out) could not take place without big business sponsors (and tax-payer money put in by councils) underpinning the loss-making events that 'celebrate' all that is wrong with Modern Britain.

Gary Hume -- "Capital"

The people 'celebrating' these new Olympic posters, the modern art promoters and collectors, do not live in the real world. They want to kid us that these child-like scribblings offer something "exciting" or "vibrant" or "enriching," the same buzz-words they use to inform us plebs that multi-racism is so beneficial to us! This from the people who only mix with rich 'coconut' ethnics (black on the outside, white on the inside), whose sole idea of "mixing it" with ethnics is which au pair they employ (isn't that a modern form of slavery?), which restaurants they go to, and pay Abdul at the 24-hour petrol station. You think that last one is far-fetched? Billy Bragg actually used that ('I get on great with the Asian at the local petrol station' or somesuch) to justify multi-racism when he lives in hideously White Dorset, not his native London (now very "native").

These people live in their one bubble of luvees, Guardianistas, Islington-types and suchlike whose idea of slumming-it is to fore go their Starbuck's Choca-Mocha Double Grande Vanilla Latte. They live in their gated communities or their white flight enclaves, and tell us that all the degenerate modern world has to offer from inner city London drugs gangs to the output of Tracey Emin is "enriching".

Sorry chaps but it isn't.

It is all soulless and degenerate. Since the 60s the world of art, politics, religion, culture, education, communities etc. etc. have all been ripped apart. The very soul of these building blocks of our society have had their innards ripped out by the Frankfurt School 'Degenerate Moderns' - the Commissars of the New Age.

I'm not saying everything was "perfect" before the 60s, because it so clearly was not, but the answer to that world was not the uber-liberalism of the 60s, which has delivered us a society wherein every gangsta knows their "rights" but so very few know their duties.

Ruth McKenzie of the "Cultural Olympiad" - Degenerate Modern?

The London riots were interesting insofar as it was possible, if only for a short time, that the world of the ganstas might infringe on the Degenerate Moderns... but whereas the police were content to stand back and watch the multi-culti gangstas rip apart the homes and businesses of 'ordinary' people in London, I wonder how fast they would have moved in (even with the army!) if the same rioters had marched on Westminster (or even worse - for them) Islington, Chiswick or Kensington and impinged on the 'bubble' of the likes of our political and cultural "leaders."

One thing is clear, yesterday's news output with its 'Gay Scottish Tory' and its Olympics Modern Art shows just how bad things have gotten in Modern Britain. Will it get even darker before the dawn?

Time for White Nationalists to Fight Back - Against the Masonic Powers

Many "white nationalists" will sneer at blacks and Muslims. But I tell you what, if so many white Christian patriots were as honest and forthright as some of the patriots from those cultures - we would have won already! Not to mention the way other races help each other out, or the number of children they have! We think we are so "superior" yet we can't even hang on to what we have got, defend our traditions, keep our homelands for ourselves...

Do we accept a Oriental looking down on us? No. Yet they are probably "more academic."

Do we accept a Jew looking down on us? Hell, no. Yet they are certainly more educated in laws and suchlike.

Do we accept a Pakistani looking down on us? Dear God, no. Yet they put family first, have large families, push their children to get educational achievements and help out each others' businesses.

I believe in racial separation. Not because I think my people are any worse or better than any other (I have enough common sense to know we may be better than some, and may be worse than some, in various aspects, but that's academic). No, I simply love my people, my nation, my race. It is perfectly natural. I fully accept that other peoples in other races will feel likewise. It is as natural as the air we breathe.

I do not hate others. I loathe those criminals, from any races, whether they be the predominantly black muggers or the predominantly white paedophiles, the shyster lawyers and banksters or the ASBO louts wrecking estates; we need to put aside all political correctness and come down hard on such degenerates, for the betterment of all peoples.

It is my sincere belief that mass migration of peoples has had a hugely detrimental effect on society. This can be solved by resettling peoples into their own homelands (if necessary with financial support and so on). Is it a mere coincidence that mass immigration has coincided with the loss of faith in the UK? Certainly the 'creation' of a multi-cult mess has been used by the red atheist commissars (who push for more immigration) to force through a sickening secularism that suffocates us all and destroys much of our heritage and traditions. It seems that the politicians who defend this "enriching diversity" choose to live in white enclaves, where the only immigrants they see is their au pair and perhaps the waiters at the restaurants they frequent.

Anyway, let us return to the nationalists and patriots from other races, those who fight for their own people and not to subjugate their neighbours. I believe it was GK Chesterton who once said that a patriot fights for his people, whereas an imperialist fights to put others down. The arch imperialists of today are obviously the Zionists (in Israel, America and Britain) out to impose their distorted worldview on everyone, by guise or war, bribery or threat.

There are some Islamicists who try to ape Zionist means (in a not so subtle way) but most of those are Mossad/CIA led puppets anyway, creating the bogeyman that the Zionists need to keep the sheep backing their never ending "war on terror" (sic).

Yet what happens to the nationalists who stand up against the "New World Order" (new name for an old enemy)? Invariably the NWO declares war on them. This may be financial, it may be character assassination, but when they get the chance (or if the nationalist poses a threat to their power) they move in for the kill.

One thinks of Nasser in Egypt, Saddam in Iraq, the WW2 "fascist" powers, even Blanco in Fascist Spain in the 70s. To a lesser extent one might even (at a stretch!) put JFK in there, if only because he threatened the military-industrial might of America.

Nationalists in Britain need to wake up. Back in the 80s when the NF said Gaddafy was a 'good man' all too many were waiting to boo and jeer (doubtless egged on by same paid-up assets). "He's a wog/lefty/Marxist" were some of the base comments.

As today we get the old 'terrorist' canard flung, when Pan Am, the German disco and WPC Fletcher are hardly cut and dried cases. Even his giving explosives to the IRA, though a mistake, is kind of understandable when you see that Libya was being attacked by the British left, right and centre. We even funded "Islamicists" to try and kill him - which resulted in innocent bystanders dying. Are we surprised then that Libya chose to "hit back" using those that told him they would "bomb Britain?" They were wrong (two wrongs never make a right) but it is almost understandable.

Imagine if Gaddafy had funded 'Muslim extremists' to kill a British PM, which killed innocents. The UK/NATO etc. would have levelled Libya! Or imagine Libyan jets had bombed the US President's home (on a flimsy pretext) and killed one of his family?

Who are the terrorists?

Ask yourself how many Iraqis died after America illegally invaded that country, partly as revenge for Saddam daring to fire Scud rockets at Israel years before. yet America is all about democracy and freedom right? And Iran is all about hate and evil? Who has Iran killed? How many? Sure they hang terrorists, homosexuals etc. as part of their justice system - but have they invaded other countries like America? Have they napalmed villages as in the 60s? Dropped Uranium weapons on European soil as in the 90s? Brought a firestorm holocaust to at least two European cities as in the 40s? Or illegally invaded a country resulting in many tens of thousands of innocent civilians dying, as in this decade?

Freedom? Democracy? Cheap buzzwords bandied by media puppets and gullible idiots to disguise a Masonic regime drunk on power and out to destroy anyone who may stand up to that power, now known to be overwhelmingly Zionist.



Watch this first video on Gaddafy. It is a bit schmaltzy in parts (dig those groovy beats baby), some of the language is a bit too Muslim for my tastes, and even Nelson Mandela gets a look-in. But look beyond all that. Look at what the man did. He freed his country from foreign army bases. He gave his people freedom from usury-debt. He gave his people free education and healthcare. He gave his people cheap/accessible housing, work, land, education and healthcare.

As for his Islam, it was a product of his birth. If there is a fault it is with those who apostatised hundreds of years ago or were forced to convert by the sword. One cannot blame most Arabs for being born Muslim anymore than one can blame most Indians for being born Hindus. What excuse to our compatriots have who worship at shopping malls on a Sunday, whose idea of a pilgrimage is to Ibiza or whose idea of a Saint is Stephen Lawrence? We point the finger so readily at others, yet it all seems so "splinter versus log" sometimes.

Meanwhile, in "civilised" America so many people have lost their homes, jobs, land. So many people have little or no healthcare. Many people have a shoddy or worthless education. Let's not even mention the crime, drugs, gangs etc.

Land of the Free eh? Free to lose their jobs and homes whilst their government taxes them to pay the usurers' interest! Freedom seems all about who can afford it, and the biggest cheques will always be written by the bankers.

It is a scandal of gargantuan proportions, and only the controlled media kid most people into thinking otherwise, i.e. that they are really free because they can choose between Masondum and Masondee.

We get freedom. Freedom for our kids to drown in a sea of drugs, crime, porn, violence, debt, job insecurity, third-rate education. But it's all apparently OK cos we get to put a cross in a box every 4 or 5 years when the controlled media tell the vast majority to vote for the Mason with the Blue rosette or the Mason with the Red rosette.

Where are the white, Christian, nationalist voices against this con? Oh we had our day - we used to have heroes, men right across Europe from England to Serbia, from Spain to Sweden, from France to Poland - men who defended Christian traditions, men who exposed Communism for the sterile hatred it was, men who exposed Capitalism for the slavery it is.

Where are that breed of well-educated, thoughtful, forthright and brave men today? "Our" people are too busy excusing homosexuals, playing footsie with Zionists, pushing a kosher-liberal agenda to "fight the muzzies" and win the Eastenders-watching generation.

We may not agree with everything they have said, and everything they have done - but people like Gaddafy and Farrakhan ("bloody wogs" tm) at least have the strength to name names and defend their people, to expose the debt swindle, to point at the Zionists as the enemies of civilisation.

What nationalist leader in Europe or the UK would dare to stand before the media's cameras and chide them for hiding the Truth? Who would dare say to them that the people who control banking also control the media! It takes someone like Farrakhan to do it. Oh there have been brave Whites in America too (one thinks of people like Joe Sobran, Michael Hoffman, David Duke and Michael Piper Collins), but where are our political leaders in Europe? More specifically in the UK?

Let's see Farrakhan tearing a strip from the media. The words 'pearls before swine' spring to mind. "You don't know what it's like to be a free white person" - Amen to that! Watch the dumb goy look on.




The enemies of civilisation know their power is crumbling. The terrible crimes of the bankers, the politicians, the media. The scandals of the needless wars. The crumbling of the Euro. The debt slavery of America.

Yet here we are, with a complicit media talking about Greece, about pensions in the UK, about fat cat's bonuses rising,without dissecting the real level of debt or our unending slavery to the banks. They waffle on about this and that, about crusties sitting outside St Paul's Cathedral, about that Cathedral being shut for the first time since 1942, about rising fuel bills and all the rest of it - but the boil is never lanced. They dance around the edge of the problem, never daring to wade in and get amongst the dirt and grime.

Meanwhile we are supposed to be thrilled that our planes were used to level Sirte, to provide cover to the rapers of Tripoli's women and that usury-free Libya will now be "democratic."

God help the Libyans, if they get even half the problems America has today they will be begging for the return of Gaddafy, even with his faults. Yet, America - mired in debt, terror and corruption - was behind the destruction of Libya:




People in this country are sick and tired. Sick and tired of lies and half-truths. Sick and tired of political correctness. Sick and tired of the pigs at the trough. Sick and tired of the working man being taxed to the hilt to pay for the millionaires. Sick and tired of needless foreign adventures. Sick and tired of corruption covered up again and again. Sick and tired of MPs who put the interests of oligarchs and the powerful ahead of us.

The house of cards is shaking.

Communism has failed. Capitalism is failing. Where is the Nationalist Alternative?!!! Whilst this goes on and the whole system stinks, the main (whether we like it or most likely do not!) "nationalist" party, the BNP, is still waffling on about Muslim gangs grooming white girls in English cities.

Now I'm not saying that's not a terrible thing that should be stamped out, but so is heroin addiction across our white communities. So is mugging in our inner cities. So  are guns and knives being used against the young. So are the never end stream of paedos that seem to pop up everywhere.

But these are symptoms!!! They are mere symptoms of a sick, corrupt and degenerate post-Christian society that is crying out for sane economics, sane politics and sane morality.

We have a duty to defend the Truth. This was once a Christian land. Christ said "the Truth will set you free" and in this world where a miasma of lies, the smoke and mirrors of the controlled media, where war, fear of war and rumours of war are meant to keep us in our place -- we all have a duty to speak out, name names, and defend the Truth.

We need nationalists. We need patriots.

If we do not present a valid alternative to the system as it crumbles, they will cobble together some half-baked get out clause and things will worsen and worsen. We, and all the peoples of the world, will face a slow agonising death.

The Communists have no answers,. No-one is interested in collectivisation. People want freedom, they believe in the family, they want work. The media with its 'talking head' experts tries to convince us that White is Black and Black is White. The Agony Aunts of 101 themes spout their Neo-Liberal 60s crap to tell us that homos can get married, that families can manage without dads, that "human rights" are vital in schools where lawlessness reigns and when most of the children are frightened of the walk home, that drugs are just fine and dandy -- but smacking a naughty child is  a heinous crime deserving of a custodial punishment and putting the child into a 'secure environment' (like the council homes where paedophilia, prostitution, drugs and alcohol addiction are rife).

We must present an answer to all this insanity. The banking crisis. The moral mess. The endemic crime. The corruption in the media, politics and economics.

People are crying out for answers. They can see that everything is a dreadful mess.

Do we, as white, Christian patriots have the courage to stand our ground, face down the enemy, and educate and defend our people in this hour of need? Or will we all wave our little Union Jacks, moan about Muslims, down our beers and moan about "the Pakis having huge families" and read the emails saying "donate now to save Britain" a dozen times sent out by some grubby, shyster-politician out to line his pockets?

One road leads to struggle and freedom, the other leads to obscurity, defeat and the mentality of the bunker.

MP Calls for War Crimes Investigation into Libyan Rebels

From Killing Libyans to Cuddling a Dog. Ahh.

A Scottish MP has called for War Crimes Trials over the illegal actions and criminal gangster tactics of the "National Transitional Council" rebel troops in Libya.

Thomas Docherty MP, a member of the House of Commons defence select committee, has - according to a report in The Scotsman - "written to the Foreign Secretary William Hague challenging the UK government to ensure a full, impartial and credible investigation takes place."

He cited the killing of PoWs in Sirte, the city destroyed by NATO planes and rebel troops, after NATO was sent in to (don't laugh) "defend Libyan civilians." He might ask that the torture of military and civilian prisoners and the mass-rapes that occurred in Tripoli by the 'gallant forces of democracy' (sic) also be seriously looked into also.

Speaking of war criminals, the last Tornadoes flew back to Britain from their bases in Italy from where they had been attacking loyalist cities such as Sirte and Tripoli, all in the name of "defending civilians" of course! Quite how one stops civilians being killed in Benghazi by killing civilians in Sirte is anyone's guess! I guess it all depends on whether those civilians were loyal to Libya, or the Rothschild/Islamic cabal, or not.

The French Front National Surrenders to Freemasonry

Nationalism loses before it's even begun!

Ru Tube video

Why do political parties have to become Masonic in order to get even the crumbs from the top table?

As the young reporter Leon Degrelle - aka Tintin - might have uncovered in the interwar years, democracy is rule by a shadowy oligarchy in which all the main players have to surrender to their worldview.

We live in an oligarchy, a Masonic oligarchy.

Libyan Rebels Commit War Crimes

The BBC is reporting that the "NTC" rebel forces in Libya (preparing to be the new government) has carried out a war crime against prisoners.

Just the sort of affair Kampfgruppe Peiper was accused of in Normandy, 1944. So will the Libyan rebels chief face similar war crimes trials?

As the rebels committed war crimes against fighters and civilians alike, in places like Tripoli and Sirte (but it's all OK, cos they will have elections!), who was providing the cover that allowed them to raid homes, rape the women, cart off men to torture centres and murder PoWs? Why it was NATO - under the pretext of "protecting civilians" they even bombed civilian areas themselves!

It really does beggar belief doesn't it?

Australian Police Obey the Bankers - Against the People

And it's not just in New York.




The police in what were once civilised lands are protecting the usury-bankers and NWO elite.



"The people" come at the bottom of a long list.

NYPD: To Protect and Serve - Who???

Yes. We should ask that question: who do the state forces protect?

Our politicians tells us the first duty of government is to protect the people, yet they deliver us into the clutches of international financiers who bleed us dry, who embroil us in needless wars.

Who are they protecting? Not us.

Who are they serving? Not us.

Might we suggest: the "you know whos?"

Top cops have to be Freemasons. They do what the Freemason politicians tell them. The politicians are placemen of the Masonic bankers.

The few men who own the earth like to think we are "cattle" and they treat us as such, even using their Orwellian buzzwords to corral us, words like "Democracy," "Racism," "Fascist," "Rights" etc.

Even when thousands of people in the UK will die this winter because they cannot afford to 'heat and eat' whilst we funnel multi-billions into the clutches of the faceless bankers that keep us in relative penury.

All the while they will reward their placemen. Virtually every top politician leaves office and gets well-paid jobs (for doing almost nothing) as a reward for their treachery.

And that is why they will always pour money into the coffers of the bankers, whilst squeezing the rest of us until the pips squeak. So look at this video. Who are the police protecting? Who's giving the orders? Who do they protect and serve?

It sure as hell ain't "us."

Gaddafi Executed as New World Order Warning - Talmudic Revenge?

The execution designed to silence Gaddafi.

This looks like what Michael Hoffman calls the "revelation of the method" - in other words, the Neo Cons, the NWO, the Zionists are warning others, and showing their "power" by the public murder of a patriot.

Mussolini? Streicher? Saddam? All murdered in the most painful and heinous ways - as a means to get ultimate revenge on the enemies of the bankers and their puppets; and give a warning to those who "dare" to stand against them.

With Gaddafi we also have to ask if people like Blair wanted him silenced for fear he would show all the dirty deals and subterfuge "our" leaders undertake when dealing with African and Arab countries.

This is a very interesting and informative news broadcast (would that the BBC with MI6's John Simpson would do such a thing!). How long before Ofcom do to Russia Today what they have done to Iran's Press TV and ban it from our airwaves?

Welcome to the New World Order - where "our boys" can bomb a city to "protect civilians." It all seems so.... well, Israeli!

With thanks to: Thought and Action

Gadaffy Dead? Now the Suffering Starts for Libya

Mobile phone footage broadcast on the BBC

If the reports are correct and Colonel Muammer Gaddafy is indeed dead, then Libya can now look forward to years of suffering as Islamicists battle with those in new York's pocket. Usury banking and strangulation-force taxes are a joy the Libyans are yet to embrace, but which we in the "international community" enjoy from cradle to the grave.

The NATO bombing of civilian areas gave the lie to the UN resolutions used as an excuse to launch military attacks on the government of Libya. UN resolutions against Israel, with its concentration camps, child prisoners and illegal nukes, sit gathering dust in the meantime.

What tomorrow holds for Libya is as unclear as the CIA spin put on recent events, which including NATO commandos on the streets killing Libyans. As for the people of Tripoli and Sirte... their loyalties will be long remembered by those with Talmudic-style memories when it comes to retaliation and revenge.

No doubt the news media will wax lyrical about Lockerbie and WPC Fletcher, both crimes for which Libya had no blame, whilst covering up British funding of Muslim terrorists who had tried to kill Gaddafy in the past (and killed innocent by-standers) and the American terror air raids on Tripoli.

You see the "bad guys" are always the "terrorists" whereas the 'international community' (CIA, MI6, Mossad) when it bombs, kills, maims etc. usually just brushed it under the carpet.

Will Libya be one country under the heel of the Rothschilds? Or will it split into its component parts? Will it become a 'hardline' Muslim country? Or will it become a Western vessel state with all the endless debt, poverty and hunger that invariably follow?

Two things are for sure:

• The truth about recent events in Libya has yet to be told.
• The future for Libyans will be "interesting" to say the least.

The West will now screech for "democracy" knowing that they will be on-hand to pour in their money to ensure their place-men have a key role, if not outright control.

Now, regardless of the chaos, terror or retribution in Libya, the Neo Cons will turn their faces to Iran.

The Marranos and the Role of the Enemies of Civilisation

War propaganda and lies started way before WW2

History often gives us examples we can use to our benefit. Warnings from history, if you like, of how certain forces behave.

Put your crash helmet on. This is a bit of a rant...

The Borgias are often used as the example par excellence of Catholic corruption, treachery, gluttony, murder, lechery, greed, cronyism, nepotism and worse.

What the 'modern world' choose to forget is that the Borgias were Marranos, the "secret Jews" of Iberia* whose very scandals against Christianity (secretly continuing their Talmudic and Khabbalah wickedness) caused the Spaniards to embrace the Inquisition.

The Inquisition - which, remember could only act against professing Catholics - was used to seek out heresy in Catholicism, in particular those who continued their Talmudic ways and/or sought to undermine Catholicism out of some sort of Talmudic hatred.

As a result, historically speaking, the Reformation by-passed Spain as the Spanish church was free of corruption, hypocrisy, heresy and those who would destroy it from within.

The fifth column within Christendom published Protestant polemical works and "six million hysterical-style" works against the Inquisition, not because they were Protestant Christians, but because they hated the Catholic Church for rooting out hidden Talmudism via the Inquisition, and open Talmudism in 1492 when the Jews were expelled from Spain.

Even non-Catholics must wonder why Spain remained a bastion of Catholicism (even providing the "shock troops" of the Counter Reformation that won back Austria, Poland, Hungary, Bavaria, etc. for Catholicism) when so much else of Europe shuddered and split (even countries such as Poland, Hungary and France).

And historians must also wonder if it is sheer coincidence that the terrible example of the Borgias, the Marranos that crept in and took the Papacy via guile, treachery, blackmail and worse, gave the ammunition to those who would attack Catholicism, split Europe and bring about chaos and bloodshed for many years.

There is a lesson here for patriots of every kind.

Those who turn a blind eye to the (actual or spiritual) Marranos of today, those who let them rise to the top without questioning their loyalty or defending the Truth, deserve all they get.

In England in 1717, the Marranos of that era formed the Freemasons, who would worm their way into rich and even royal circles. They would embrace revolution, murder and intrigue across Europe to bring down countries, to help their worldview and to destroy Christianity or make it subservient to their aims.

Liars and subverters

Is nationalism today wise to Freemasonry? To Freemasons and their nefarious ways?

When nationalism starts defending "Western democracy," homosexuality, feminism, Israel etc. etc. we have to wonder whose side we are on. Have 'we' been "flipped" by the Marranos of today? Certainly there are accusations being flung around that would make it seem as though the Borgias are alive and well and living in Britain.

If the corruption, cronyism, betrayal, sexual degeneracy etc. is as bad in nationalism as many think, then these evil days will be flung back in the face of nationalists many years from now, just as the example of the Talmudic Borgias are against Catholics even today some 500 years later.

The BNP have a Uruguayan candidate for the Mayor of London with the name of Carlos Cortiglia. NW Nationalists have unearthed someone posting on the Jewish Chronicle (official Zionist paper and Mossad disinformation outlet) website using that name (here). He heaps praise on the bandit State of Israel which is no ally of the UK, has illegal nukes and continually breaks UN resolutions with impunity.

Now maybe this is a troll who's out to make the BNP candidate look bad, but given that BNP London candidates have previously put out leaflets defending Israel and saying that Jews must support the BNP, that "only the BNP" can defend Jews against 'Islamofascists' and all the rest of the Murdoch-press style editorialising, we are left (as in the case of Peter and the Wolf) of putting the evidence together and coming to one realisation.

In the 1960s Freemasonry brought about changes in the Catholic Church, just as they carried out revolution on the streets, took over more political and media circles etc. via their Frankfurt School. They were out to change society, to put Marxist ideas in place of traditional Christian ones.

Just one of their lines of attack has been to put homosexuals in positions of power, in the media, in the church and in politics. That is why the population has been brainwashed into thinking that "homosexuality is OK" when even just a few decades ago it was an unthinkable abomination.

For the church itself this "homosexualisation" resulted in the paedophile scandal, and with Masonic-liberal placemen at or near the top of the Catholic church, they wanted to find excuses for the queers and move them around, cover-up the abuse and disguise their own ineptitude and mistake in allowing the queers into the seminaries in the first place (the rules pre-60s used to be VERY harsh against any sexual proclivities).

Viva Torquemada and Swazis? Zionists at work

To expose the queer-paedos was to expose the liberalism of the church under the heretical John Paul II, whose New Age happy-clappy ecumenical hog-wash had destroyed Catholicism and emptied the pews. The enemies of the Catholic church knew what was going on, but stayed quiet. They helped the cover-up. (Today they campaign to get more queers into the church).

Then, when Benedict XVI took over, the deluge began. What had been disparate whispering and micro-scandals broke, via the enemy/controlled media, into a global tidal wave. The church was crucified by the forces of Marxian-liberalism, who were the very ones who created the situation that allowed the abuse to take place in the first instance - just as a Pope started to make some noises that the liberals did not like!

You see, the enemies of civilisation, whether it is the church, politics, business or any other sphere of civilisation, will enter within, create a scandal - then scream from the outside that there is a scandal and use it to strengthen their position, usually via weakening or destroying the institution they entered in the first place, and usually once their placemen have moved on.

This is the lesson for nationalism, whether it was the forerunners of the Zionists creating the scandals of the Borgias, of the Pinko-Marxists putting queers into the church and creating the paedophile scandals of the 70s/80s.

Nationalists need to be aware. The Zionists, Freemasons and homosexuals, the spiritual heirs of these examples that history has given us, would love to undermine and wreck nationalism (from within and without). Some would argue they already have.

In the shadow of the Fox-Werrity scandal and the Mossad-front pressure groups who poured money into the shadowy groups behind their "friendship," we have to be aware that these people work in all manner of circles and in creepy ways, using greed, sex and ego to destroy their enemies.

Nationalism is not immune.






---

* Whilst being corrupt and degenerate, the Borgia Marrano Pope Alexander VI, according to his Wikipedia entry ..."distinguished himself by his relatively benign treatment of Jews. After the 1492 expulsion of Jews from Spain, some 9,000 impoverished Iberian Jews arrived at the borders of the Papal States. Alexander welcomed them into Rome, declaring that they were "permitted to lead their life, free from interference from Christians, to continue in their own rites, to gain wealth, and to enjoy many other privileges." He similarly allowed the immigration of Jews expelled from Portugal in 1497 and from Provence in 1498.

So we can see that sexual degeneracy, liberalism and favouritism to those who embrace the Talmud ("their own rites") are the hallmarks of the fifth column against Christian civilisation - from that day to this!

Ofcom Move Against Press TV: Neo-Con Pressure?

It seems Press TV, the Iranian English language news service, is to be taken off British TVs.

Yet we are told we have "freedom of speech" by the few Masons who run the media in the UK.Unlike Channel 4 and 5 Press TV doesn't put out porn. Unlike the Zionist Richard Desmond, Press TV doesn't publish hardcore porn. Unlike BBC1 and BBC2 Press TV doesn't undermine public decency and morality by promoting homosexuality, blasphemy or using foul language.

Still, if a channel does not publish porn, filth, blasphemy and crudities it can still be pushed out of the UK, on a technicality, if it is opposed to the Neo-Con and Israeli interests.

What is it the system fears? Aren't we allowed to watch an alternative to BBC/ITV/Sky News?

Watch Press TV this week (on Sky channel 515) while you can. If they push out Press TV, Nationalists should also check in from time to time on Russia Today (Sky 512). It's a good way to get an alternative view to the Pinko-leftist and Neo-Con Capitalist views of the "establishment" channels, whether it's their headline news programmes or in-depth features, interviews etc.


Link:
Ofcom's move against Press TV

Mother and Father Deemed Irrelevant or Offensive?

There is a piece on Griffin Watch, which deals with a media story on the EU putting "Parent 1" and "Parent 2" on passports so's faggots can put their details with a clear conscience (!). I felt a rant coming on (apologies to Ranting Ron) so here's my response:

We Need an EU Law so Sad Gits Can "Marry" Foodstuffs*

This is the ultimate reality for the Masonic and Red enemy. In a world where there is no OBJECTIVE TRUTH, but wherein everything is subjective to our whims, where "democracy" extends to the family and 'sexuality' (i.e. where parents have no rights to control their children, and where men can "decide" they are 'really women'), why is this so surprising?

In an age when nationalists attack Muslims for being opposed to homosexuality (one of their very few redeeming features) itself a remnant of the fact they are a Christian Heresy, why are we surprised that the EU is now dictating that a mother and father begetting children is no longer the accepted norm?

An OBJECTIVE TRUTH: a child has one father and one mother is replaced by relativist nonsense, viz that a child can have two mothers, two fathers, and no doubt one mum and one section of the Berlin Wall - or whatever crazy notion infects the body politic in the near future.

The modern world is, quite literally crazy. At the centre of it are the immoral degenerates called homosexuals. They seem to [if you'll pardon the pun] have a vice-like grip on this and the previous government and seem intent on pushing their (very) queer agenda, at a time when real parents have very real worries, and it isn't about "mother and father" being on a passport!

The EU is Masonic, Socialist - dare I say Satanic?

They have an agenda which is to destroy the family and destroy every last vestige of Christian civilisation.

There can be little doubt in an age when they tax us to the hilt to give billions to bankers, and at a time when families have rights stripped away, and homosexuals get "rights" left, right and centre.

We've been dealt a bum hand!

---

*As long as it is a loving, caring relationship, of course.

Libyan Patriots Fight Back in Tripoli Against the Terrorists

A "NTC" rocket launcher being used against Sirte civilians

So "Gadaffy Loyalists" (not "brave Libyan Resistance fighters defending civilians from roving gangs of terrorists intent on rape, beatings and looting") are fighting back in Tripoli.

After "the West" told us all it was super-safe, and everyone except Lady Gaga had made whistle stop tours there (usually only to the inside of some nondescript building that could have been in Slough!).

Don't believe the lies of the media:

• NATO were not "protecting civilians" or else they would not be bombing civilian areas.
• NATO forces HAVE been on the ground killing and maiming.
• The Rebels have committed atrocities against civilians, including rapes in Tripoli.
• And much worse will probably come out in the weeks, months and years ahead.
• Is going house to house in Tripoli and Sirte any different from Benghazi - used an excuse to drag us into the conflict?

We should not be taking sides in a Libyan conflict.
We should not be enforcing Rothschild-backed regime change.
Nationalists should back the anti-usury Green revolution, whatever its minor failings.

Gadaffy's Green Book may not be pitch perfect for us, but it is a Libyan solution to Libyan problems and as much as it is based on the Fascist Corporatist/Medieval Christian Guild structures as espoused by Nationalists from the 19th Century to WW2 and beyond, we should give it our support and learn from its positive lessons and its mistakes.

Interestingly, one of the few outlets for some truth in all this - Press TV - is, so it is being Tweeted, being attacked by 'Ofcom' (the communications watchdog) and could well be taken off Sky satellite/digital TV. their reports clearly have the British State and its Zionist backers worried.

It is up to Nationalists to spread the truth about these world events, even if inbred, deadbeat morons in the BNP say we are "muzzie lovers" (as they did to FC when we were forthright in defending the Palestinian cause). The cheap labels thrown by those so keen to take the shekels of the enemy mean nothing to us Third Positionists.

Quote of the Week: Codreanu on Democracy

Tip of my Charles I-era foppish wig to Thought & Action for this one.
I normally plonk quotes of the week in the side column, but this one is just too darn big, so here goes lifted straight from the aforementioned blog of good repute... Rumour has it this is going to be the foreword for the next BNP manifesto. Kerching!




Codreanu wrote the following with Romania in mind but it can be applied to your Nation also:

“Democracy breaks the unity of the Romanian people, dividing it into parties, stirring it up, and so, disunited, exposing it to face the united block of the Judaic power in a difficult moment of its history.

This argument alone is so grave for our existence that it would constitute sufficient reason for us to change this democracy for anything that could guarantee our unity: namely our life; for our disunity means death…
Democracy is incapable of continuity in effort. Divided into parties that govern one, two or three years, it is incapable of conceiving and accomplishing a long range plan. One party nullifies the plans and the efforts of another. What was conceived  and built by one today is demolished next by another.

In a country in need of construction, whose historical moment is that very construction, this drawback of democracy constitutes a threat. It is as if on a farm the owners would change yearly, each coming with different plans, doing away with what the predecessors did, their work only to be done away with by the next owner coming tomorrow.

Democracy makes it impossible for the statesman to do his duty. A statesman of the greatest good will becomes, in a democracy, the slave of his supporters; he either satisfies their personal appetites or they destroy his backing. The statesman lives under the tyranny and permanent threat of the electoral agent.

He is placed in the position of choosing either the renunciation of his lifetime’s labour or the satisfaction of his supporters. And then the politician satisfies their appetites; not out of his pocket, but out of the country’s pocket. He creates jobs, positions, missions, commissions, sinecures, all of them loading down the national budget which burdens more and more the ever more bowed backs of the people.

Democracy is incapable of authority. It lacks the power of sanction. A party, for fear of losing its supporters, does not apply sanctions against those who live through scandalous business deals running into the millions, through thievery or embezzlement; nor does it apply any sanctions against political adversaries lest they expose its own shady deals and incorrectitudes.

Democracy is in the service of high finance. Because of the expensive system and the competition among various groups, democracy needs a lot of money. As a natural consequence it becomes the slave of the great Jewish international finance which subjugates it through loans and subsidies.”

BNP Panorama Programme: A Nationalist Analysis

So what to make of last night's Panorama?

I don't think the BNP leadership will lose too much sleep. Yes, there is the danger that they may be arrested for fraud. The tone of the programme though came across as quite petty and vindictive. The 'man on the Clapham omnibus' will be thinking "the BNP has done what all the other parties do and the BBC are chasing the BNP because the latter are 'racist'."

And if the man-on-the-street thinks that, the dwindling number of Griffin loyalists will think so too, with just a few put off by the evidence of sleaze, and so the BNP will continue to be some form of cash-cow.

There's not much more to it than that really and if you want to analyse it, pick through the minutiae then I daresay lots of forums (fora?) will do that. The worst part for the BNP was when NG slinked away from the press conference - it looked decidedly dodgy, as if he really did have something to hide. But otherwise... just looked like typical dodgy politicians doing what politicians do: skimming, infighting, flinging rumours and counter-rumours and fleecing their supporters.

The worst the BNP can expect is that the average voter will dismiss them saying "you're all as bad as each other."

I think if the BBC had wanted to kill-off the BNP they could have done. After all how does £2 Million profit in one year convert into £6-500,000 of debts? Over-spending just does not cover it. As the lady in Jack Ruby's bar in the film JFK said "it's as crooked as a dog's hind leg."

But then some of those being used to attack NG were a part of the original scams and so not exactly in a position to "incriminate" themselves in the fleecing of BNP members for the personal profit of a handful of people. The Gordian Knot that is the BNP's finances over the last few years is unlikely to be unravelled by any of those involved in handling those self-same finances.

And so the mess, the cronyism and the betrayal is likely to roll on. And if Griffin is arrested? More "donate now" mail outs to beat "the State repression" will follow, surely as night follows day.

Libyan Resistance news

Keep an eye on this You Tube channel for 'the news behind the news' that the Rothschild-BBC will not bring you, including NATO Commandos being used on the ground in Libya, as well as the suffering of Libyan civilians thanks to NATO bombing (a direct contradiction of the UN resolution that they use as an excuse).

Homosexual Lobby Denies Parents - the Madness Continues

"Mom and dad on their first date"

Mums and dads on passports are to be replaced by "parent 1" and "parent 2" because of the homosexual lobby.

The mad, bad, modern world dictates that we should be free to name our parents as whoever we feel we should, whereas common sense, science, fact and truth dictate that everyone has a biological mother and biological father. Even the "gay lobby" can't agitate that basic truth away!

So where next? Can a screaming liberal nutter put the name of an elderly tortoise as his father? If not why not? Surely that is the logical conclusion of this utter madness?

Link:
PC Passport

You think that's mad? No madder than changing marriage from being a legal, sacred and immemorial contract/oath between a man and a women "till death us do part" into an 'as long as it lasts' hug-fest between God knows what and God knows whom.

Will BNP Panorama be Used by Usury Bankers to Stop Opposition?

Christ drives the Usurers out of the Temple, woodcut

There seems to be some debate going on, on the interweb (also known as 'tinternet near the Pennines) over the Panorama programme on the BNP.

Now let us discount the Griffinites/Griffinistas, that motley band of ever-decreasing (paid) sycophants who employ several sock puppet personas to defend their lord and master. Their line seems to be "it's something over nothing" (which it clearly ain't) as sturdy and relevant as the Maginot line in 1940. As a second line of defence, they are screeching that those who "work with" Panorama are traitors to Nationalism, working with those of the Frankfurt School, the Marxists and uber-liberals of the BBC.

As I said in a previous post, Nick Griffin himself has a record of running to the same enemy media to attack other patriotic groups, so it is very much a case of "let he who is without sin cast the first stone." Furthermore, whilst some of those appearing may have ulterior motives (such is our fallen nature), of those who have been royally shafted by Monsieur Griffin, and especially those who have been wrongly accused of illegality and about whom severe lies have been told in order to implicate them in serious law-breaking, who are we to question their motives and to doubt their need to clear their name in an 'official' and public channel? After all what else are they supposed to do? Write about it in an anonymous forum read by a handful where Griffin's attack-dog sock puppets will add lies to their account? Or write into the BNP website where their account will be deleted?

Someone else on the webesphere (forgive my failing memory, to many early mornings to watch the rugby, so I don't know if they were a "goodie" or a "baddie") said that we should not "blame" the BBC for raking over the ashes of Nationalism. Now I know that sounds glib, but what the chap (or chapess) was getting at, is that we shouldn't be concerned at a dog returning to its vomit, or a cat marking its territory - i.e. it is yucky, it may even be revolting, smelly etc. but it is what they do. Of course Nationalists can complain and highlight the nature of these people, as with usury-bankers, but in reality we should expect no less. In fact, it should help us to sharpen up our act, for if we were moral, upstanding and decent they could only moan at us for being nationalists! No crime there m'lord.

The impressive but ultimately useless Maginot Line

So ignoring the Maginot Line and having landed our paratroopers of logic on the Fort Eben Emael of the secondary Griffinite defence, let's send our Panzers of Truth through the Ardennes. There remain two more arguments about the programme (the French Army and the British Expeditionary Force, if you will) stopping the progress to Paris (Griffin's HQ).

The French Army argument is that the programme will not be a knockout blow, making a (deliberately) weak and partisan blow (easily dismissed as the actions of anti-nationalists) which will weaken the BNP popularity even further with the voters, but will deliberately not deliver the killer-blow. So Griffin (or Paris to continue the analogy) will stand, though wounded, and limps on (perhaps in a gradual, terminal decline) but like an open wound or a festering sore, causing more pain than hope, a frail shadow of its former strength.

The British Expeditionary Force argument is that the programme will be a killer blow to Griffin, perhaps not instantaneous, but an undeniable deadly blow that cannot be ignored. It will lead to a mass walk-out of those who have not already quit the BNP in disgust. It will mean a total collapse in support and votes. It will mean some criminal convictions at the top of the BNP and thus the destruction, ruination and total devaluation of the BNP as a party, as a brand and as an historical political body. Some like to think, no doubt, that this will happen overnight, but if it does happen it will be played out, court case by court case, election by election, defection by defection, revelation by revelation - because (if the evidence is to be believed) those at the core have a vested interest in keeping the books closed, the truth under wraps and the BNP solvent, as long as they can to protect their liberty, their income and (don't laugh) their reputations.

And so there we have it. France 1940, BNP 2011. Will nationalists learn the lessons of the latter as military historians have of the former?

I am going to repeat myself now, but do bear in mind that many readers don't read this blog as often as some others, they pop in from time to time. Yesterday I had the honour of meeting a group of very dedicated activists doing what they can to fight the good fight, and more than a couple of readers of this humble blog. Though I had never met most of them before, it was like meeting old friends, compadres in the struggle for truth and justice. Speaking to them it was clear that whilst some read the blog avidly, some pop in and out. That is the nature of the internet and the modern world. I am the same with many sites, forums, twitter and blogs that I really like. You try and keep up with them, but work, family and other matters "get in the way" and you end-up playing 'catch-up' or just fling yourself in and the deep end and hope it all makes sense again.

So, for regular readers, catch-up merchants or those in at the deep end, let me re-cap some of my favourite themes on this matter:

1. The Flag NF, C18 & BNP. Whether we look at the 80s, 90s, or 00s, there are people used to disrupt Nationalism. Reactionary, Violent or Financial. The weaknesses in human nature are used by state assets. Mossad are known to use sex, pride or money to net their assets, using positive or negative means. Whatever one thinks of Mossad (and our own State services) they are not stupid. They know what to do, what buttons to push, what means to use and what misfits to appeal to or trap. As Nationalism is (nominally!) opposed to the money-power, so the money-power will use every means at its disposal to attack, wear down, split or (worst of all) control Nationalism.
2. Nick Griffin. Third Positionists warned other nationalists over 10 years ago that Griffin would betray, sell-out and stab-in-the-back his Comrades in order to promote the one thing dear to him: Nick Griffin. Yet the BNP rode the crest of a wave. As he turned the BNP into a pro-Israeli, pro-war, anti-Muslim party, he seemed to get an easy ride from the enemy media. Some say that was a quid pro quo arrangement. And as long as Nationalists are happy to accept betrayal of principles (and I don't mean endless nit-picking over the minutiae of ideology, I mean the ejection of central tenets of nationalism), they will, it could be argued, get what they deserve. And so 10 years on at the centre of a perfect storm (banks, politicians and media all undermined) the BNP is a toothless dog, unable to rally the people in the cause of National Freedom and Social Justice. Accident or design? Financial gluttony, the love of money, was certainly the root of this evil, and that evil is the neutering, the side-lining, the ruination and the total discrediting of nationalism which (we should remind ourselves) at this moment, is the only political solution outside of usury-capitalism and state-socialism to the total moral, financial, social and political ruination facing not only the UK, but all of Europe, America and much of the "civilised" world.

So, whilst some may titter at the imbroglio in/of the BNP, especially those outside it or who have quit it in disgust at the financial and moral mess of its higher echelons (Granny-Porngate being just the choicest of examples), it is in reality a salient lesson for us all.

It may seem "boring" or "backwards" or (shock, horror) "purist" but they days when nationalism could afford to be amoral (let alone immoral!) has gone. Politics will never be a "clean" world, but it can be cleaner. We should also be aware that nationalism can attract some strange characters, with their own misconceived concepts of what nationalism is. Therefore we have a duty to ensure that nationalism is as "normal," family-based and sane as possible.

I do not claim to have all the answers and I certainly do not (unlike Monsieur Griffin) claim to be some sort of political or secular messiah, far from it being fully aware of my many shortcomings and frailties. I am happy to play a minor role, take a back seat etc. I am also happy to work with those I agree with 90% of their agenda (as long as certain central tenets are upheld). However, I and many others know that the modern world is failing. I and many others know that Nationalism has many of the (social, political, familial, economic and moral) answers needed to remedy the UK and many other states. I and many others are looking for a Nationalist banner to be raised, to defend Faith, Family, Nation.

Anti-Communist Posters in Vichy France

Extraordinary events require an extraordinary response. Take the fall of France in 1940: the total humiliation of French pride (no small thing!) led to many good souls to embrace the challenge when despondency and despair could have been the slough to slump into. Work, Family, Fatherland became the motto of Vichy France. Many brave young men went on the anti-Bolshevik Crusade. French patriots rose to the challenge and defended the honour of France at home and abroad, exposing Freemasonry and the enemies of mankind.

 The economic crisis, the MPs expenses scandal and the Murdoch phone message scandal have delivered huge opportunities. Let's be clear about that. It is a perfect storm for nationalism. It is akin to 1920s Germany. To 1930s America. Nationalism should be rampant! The banks, politicians, EUrophiles, media - all should be retreating before clear nationalist force. But just like the Catholic Church let in liberalism and Masonry 50 years ago (to be "in-tune" with the Modern World), and so turned a blind-eye to poofs and Marxists entering its seminaries and reaped the whirlwind in the paedophile scandal which an enemy media used to discredit it; so the nationalist movement has been undermined and weakened by events which began when the BNP changed its stance on Israel, so it could be in-tune with the "modern world" (Freemasonry) and be an "anti-Muzzie" pressure valve, making lots of money.

Now, just as Christianity must turn its back on Freemasonry, liberalism and homosexuality if it hopes to offer an answer to the mess materialism has made of the civilised world, so nationalism must turn its back on Freemasonry, liberalism and homosexuality if it hopes to offer answers to the political mess of the civilised world.

We are entering a time when people have to choose: eat or heat. The hard times will roll on. More people are put on the dole or in dead-end Mcjobs. The political classes are out of touch. They are either free-market Freemason usury Capitalists in hock to the banksters, or flea-bitten Freemason liberal-Marxists in hock to the banksters. Thus their only answer to the banking crisis is to pour "money" created out of thin air into the banks' vaults (computer systems) for we tax-payers to pay back with actual money, taxed from our hard-earned wages from our labour. We will be working to pay off the endless debts of the banking system!

Those who face the eat or heat challenge will be being taxed to pay the trillion pound debts of the billionaires' usurious banking system!

Where is the Christian Nationalist answer? Where is the Crusade against usury? Where is the sheer force of the urgument of common sense for the common good, Social Justice delivered for the betterment of all! With one fell swoop nationalism could destroy the Wizard of Oz nonsense of global Capitalism, and the dead-end ideology of the gulags that is flea-bitten Marxism.

Let's be frank. Those who offer freedom from debt, freedom from usury, and an answer to rapacious banksters who see the workers as a means to total taxation to fill their coffers, will be saluted by most of the people as saviours from debt slavery, taxation and the heat or eat generation.

Thanks to the shenanigans of the pilfering, morally decrepid BNP leadership, the Masonic system has ensured there is, at present, no credible answer on the horizon. For how can "nationalists" have an answer to the worst economic crisis in history when the "nationalist" party is involved in debts, dodgy finances, profiteering, fleecing small businesses, and allegedly breaking election laws on paying for election bills on time?

Queen Isabella and Christopher Columbus

That is the criminal reality at the centre of the BNP scandal! That they are one more scandal on top of the banks, MPs and media. They have robbed us all of offering our answer in a clear way, for have no doubt: we have the answers, but an enemy media (owned/controlled by Masonic bankers) will use the example of the BNP as a brick bat to beat us all down.

So, at 8.30pm, Monday evening, on BBC1, do watch the Panorama programme on the BNP. But watch it fully aware of all its bitter lessons and all it should impart to patriots of goodwill for the future. Perhaps, as in days of old when we might have had good, Christian kings defending their people from external and internal foes alike (would that we had a Ferdinand and Isabella of Spain today!), we should intone:

Nationalism is dead. Long live nationalism!

Gay Tories are Wrecking Our Lives, Our Society, Our Traditions

Who's Yo Daddy? Answers on a Postcard

David Cameron says he is in favour of "gay marriage" (sic) because he is a Conservative. I assume he means Conservative with a big C, i.e. a member of the Tory political party, as he is certainly not a conservative in any meaningful sense.

What is he conserving? Certainly not marriage. Marriage is already in terminal decline thanks to divorce on demand, 60s liberalism, extra benefits for single parents (especially in-school mums getting council houses).

As marriage has crumbled, so society has worsened. We can say the rise in immigration and the slow death of Christianity plays its part too, but the headlong plummet of marriage as an institution has played the central role in society's demise.

So what will creating the oxymoronic "gay marriage" actually do? It will undoubtedly  weaken marriage itself, because it makes a mockery of marriage. Traditionally (I can hear liberals screaming!) marriage was undertaken for procreation. Marriage was the bedrock on which the family was built. You know - mum and dad, bringing up children to know right from wrong.

In a society where marriage is a "take it or leave it" where everyone has a "partner" (whether married for 50 years or a two week fling to be ditched at the next drink-fuelled night club evening) are we really surprised that there is no respect any more (and I don't mean in that negro-urban gun-totin' way which results in someone being shot by an Uzi for treading on someone's toe)?

We do not respect our ancient traditions. Marriage is an empty husk in many communities. Kids have no dad, or a plethora of "dad" stand-ins. Now we are to see the "partnership" of buggery, the sterility of dykedom, put on a level pegging with the sanctity of marriage with the procreation of children.

No wonder society is falling apart!

Cameron knows that he is sticking the knife in on a Tradition that is as old as the hills. He knows this will not help society in any way.

But he has his masters to obey. The pink pound will flow into Tory coffers. The "nasty party" image will be blurred by media-luvvies who approve in their simpering way. His Lodge membership will be advanced.

We are witnessing the knife being plunged into the heart of this land, of our traditions, and the sanctity of marriage by a Rothschild hireling traitor who was born into obscene wealth and will always have obscene wealth.

The chattering classes will approve. The media will approve.

Yet who wants this? There is no popular clamour for this.

• There is popular clamour for an end to needless wars -- yet we bomb Libya.
• There is popular clamour for a vote on the EU, yet we will remain members.
• There is popular clamour for action against the utility companies who overcharge.
• There is popular clamour for action against the banks who have delivered ruination.

Yet the Tories go against popular wishes, citing lack of time, or of the economy being "more important" than these "side issues."

So how come they ignore all these vital matters, yet still find time for yet another law giving the minuscule homosexual lobby everything they ask for?

To ask the question is to instinctively know the answer.

Needless Zionist war. Stupid pro-homosexual laws. Bankers bailed out and protected. EU membership protected.

It's not so much David Cameron, as Blairbot 2.0, and it is us, the poor working plebs of the land who are being shat upon from a great height for the umpteenth year!

Lost your job? Child killed in a needless war? Business closed down? Can't afford to heat and eat?

Never mind! At least we can see some poofs getting "married" in and on the media.

What a @#+#ing joke!

BNP Ex-National Treasurer Dies of Heart Attack (David Kelly, Robin Cook...)

"Not a good treasurer" - such praise for a dead BNP "comrade"

David Hannam, perhaps best known for trying to take an under-16 y.o. girl to his bed at a BNP conference (despite being married) has, so Nick Griffin twittered, died of a heart attack.

Hannam was born in 1981. No-one is suggesting a man of 30 cannot have a heart attack, but just as the BNP finances come into focus, how "convenient" for the pocket-fillers to now have someone to point the finger at, who cannot respond to the lies, as other ex-National Treasurers have done.

It is hard not to come to one of two conclusions about the death of a very young man in such circumstances:

1. That the stress put on him via the dodgy finances and investigations contributed to his early death
2. Or that the State has done a "Dr David Kelly" to try and tie up the loose ends.

Either way the BNP chief (already slapping down Hannam's character by saying he was "frankly not a good treasurer" -- leaving some to ask why he was employed over a registered accountant then) is, being charitable, at best partly responsible for his death.

The ground is prepared for Hannam to be the fall-guy

For Hannam to die at this time simply cannot be seen to be coincidence. Certain non-BNP member(s) close to Nick Griffin are already laying the blame for missing monies and dodgy accounts, on public forums (see image to the right), at the door of Hannam... how very convenient!

Just as another ex-National Treasurer went to BBC Panorama to deny the lies of the BNP surrounding a missing £37,000, so David Hannam dies and is already being put in the frame.

It's all very, very intriguing.

Panorama BNP Special: 10th October. Get the Popcorn Ready

Tip of my White Power Bobble Hat to Griffin Watch for this news.

The BNP story is a sad one, but we warned nationalists of this over 10 years ago! We said the BNP would be dragged down, and the good name of nationalism with it.

Many years ago Nick Griffin went running to the establishment media. The Express, currently owned by a Jewish pornographer, were doing a story. I think the reporter was State/Searchlight-asset Yvonne Ridley who later "converted" to Islam and is now some sort of lefty-feminist-integrationist-Muslim-rights wallah. All very seedy.

Anyway, with the Express's story on the Third Position (they even hired a helicopter to take photo's!) which was the usual Searchlies concoction of extremists, terrorists, MI5/6, "anti-Semites," UDA/IRA etc. etc. Nick Griffin ran into the arms of the Porno-Talmudo-Searchlies-State set-up to denounce his erstwhile comrades as "mad not bad" whilst denouncing them and getting his tuppence worth of publicity. This was especially irksome as one of the TP comrades at the centre of the Express story, which Griffin delighted in adding to with his own spin, had been ripped off by NG, taking thousands of an inheritance to buy useless printing machinery in another hairbrained 'get rich quick' scheme.

I wonder if the same Nick Griffin will now condemn those talking to Panorama -- who have either having been ripped off by him, put in dodgy situations by him (with the courts etc.), and so are protecting their own backs -- as "state assets" or "Searchlies spies" when he was so quick to run to the media (when his ex-TP comrades had not dumped on him to the media or authorities) with false tales and rent-a-quotes, as he sought to ingratiate himself with the BNP?

Or is working with the Zionist media to attack nationalists OK if it is in Nick Griffin's interests to do so, but not acceptable if it goes against Nick Griffin's interests? To the impartial observer of BNP goings-on, that certainly seems to be the case.

The sad thing is that too many people have stayed quiet, looked the other way and so forth whilst the BNP has been carved up. A suitable heading for the BBC programme might be "Where Have the Millions Gone" after all just a year or two back the BNP were boasting of their having raised quite a few million in one year. Plus there's the Euro MEPs with their salaries, staff salaries and expense accounts.

Those who looked the other way may have done so for good reasons - e.g. so nationalism didn't get bad publicity - but the bad news just kept snowballing and snowballing - and now there's an avalanche of bad news, court cases, debts and more.

Meanwhile those who turn to the BBC may have various motives, some may be honest and some not. Some may be decent and some not.  Some may be genuine patriots and some not. But as the rumours, spin and half-truths start flying back and forth let us not forget that it was Nick Griffin who was happy to work with the likes of Aaronovitch, and who attacked fellow nationalists whether the Third Position, National Front or even the "dinosaurs" in the BNP.

We will have to wait and see what the BBC have unearthed, and what the corruption in the BNP has gifted the enemies of nationalism.

Libya: The Spirit of Blair Lives on as Libyan Civilians Dodge NATO Bombs

So let's get this straight shall we?

Civilians are fleeing Sirte the Gadaffy "stronghold," leaving their property, homes, livelihoods, schools, jobs...

This is the same city that NATO have been bombing as part of their remit to, erm, protect Libyan civilians from Libyan armed forces.

Outside Sirte wait, erm, Libyan armed forced, ready to storm the city. Even as the civilians fled, NATO were still bombing the city.

So exactly which Libyan civilians are NATO protecting by bombing Libyan civilian areas? And who will protect the Libyan civilians who stay in Sirte, to protect their property, from the Libyan armed forces waiting outside the city to wreak havoc/revenge (as they did in Tripoli, even raping women).

Well done NATO! You have excelled yourselves in twisting a UN Resolution beyond all recognition.

The Spirit of Tony Blair QC lives on! Business is still good for war criminals and profiteers.


Link:
Time to Tally up Civilian Deaths